Wealth does not necessarily guaranty happiness.
To what extent do you agree with this statement?
It is often convicted by the people that money cannot assure pleasure. I completely disagree to the notion because it is the only source through which all the source through which all chores and other activities performed except emotions.
To embark upon, we are the members of the 21st century which is enormously affected by the factors like globalization and so on. Moreover, a significant portion of essentials of humanity such as education, knowledge, moments, celebrations, can only be accomplished with the help of sound financial stability. while, the individuals who do not have ample resources to participate in all such activities have always to compromise with their joy. Furthermore, above statement is not as pristine in the modern world as it used to be several years back. Additionally, professional courses and lavish wedding functions make humans feel elated. Similarly, this all can be fulfilled with sound financial position and stability.Therefore, money has a direct relationship with the happiness.
However, a set of people mostly consider that it is only the secondary source of entertainment while emotions, sentiments can never be calculated in terms of it. By and large, being poor or rich is separate thing. Society members rejuvenate themselves by participating and sharing moments with each other, despite of the quantum of currency they possess. Likewise, there are plethora of modes which brings satisfaction by overwriting the power of wealth.
To conclude, I vehemently advocate that in this contemporary world funds plays a vital funds plays a vital role. Undoubtedly, it brings eminence, competition with its purchasing power and always propels humans towards a vibrant and cheerful life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 309, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
... the help of sound financial stability. while, the individuals who do not have ample ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 309, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “while” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... the help of sound financial stability. while, the individuals who do not have ample ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 719, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
... sound financial position and stability.Therefore, money has a direct relationship with t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, likewise, moreover, second, similarly, so, therefore, while, such as, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43494423792 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15923895226 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624535315985 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5717871468 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.428571429 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103475620375 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0310822575822 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377736983894 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0503935993468 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403782779927 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.