Applicants, nowadays, go through a lengthy hiring process to acquire a job. Many people believe that interviewers should focus more on personal skills rather than their experience and degrees while recruiting candidates. I agree that interpersonal skills are a prominent aspect of hiring, but they undoubtedly should not be the predominant reason to hire an individual.
Due to their expertise in technology and business, employees are considered as the pillars of an organisation. These skills are developed either during college-time or while working on specific business problems, and it is elusive to meet enterprise demand without such expertise. A solution to an issue can be implemented if faced in the past, or it will inevitably lead to a loss in business. Having experience in IT department for many years, I offered many constructive ideas upfront to maximise the business profits with the knowledge gained during higher education. Lastly, hiring someone with incompetent abilities encounter problems in the workplace where the inability of a person reflects the hiring as favouritism.
Despite having the above abilities, several interpersonal skills of an applicant can aid in increasing the chance of obtaining a job. First of all, interviewee's determination can depict their duration in the organisation, which increases the reliability of a resource. Besides, an applicant with team-building or leadership skills strengthens the team members by keeping their focus on an apparent goal. Furthermore, the employee's positive attitude towards various impediments and bottlenecks could stoke the team to stay enthusiastic and resilient. Eminent professionals with such capabilities are commonly seen in the market these days, where they impart effective solutions to well-known firms with their compounding expertise in technical, business and personal areas.
In conclusion, although personal qualities play an imperative role in a recruitment system, person's experience and education should be considered as the primary requirement, because skills developed through them provides more benefits to a company.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dominant reason to hire an individual. Due to their expertise in technology and...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...echnical, business and personal areas. In conclusion, although personal qualiti...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, furthermore, if, lastly, so, then, thus, well, while, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1816.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78343949045 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23181725732 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611464968153 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5045015623 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.714285714 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158700932059 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518655834748 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665160654328 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109538716825 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483493880702 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.