In the world of internet, the people write about a product and its review as well as their opinions about the service. Is it a good or a bad thing?
Nowadays, there is no denying that the technology has eased the life of everyone in all the walks of life. One such area which has improved the way is of product research and it has its own benefits and flaws. I feel that is both good as well as a bad thing.
On the one hand, the technology has overhauled the way consumers shop in the modern world. The comfort of shopping online cannot be outnumbered by any other means. This trend has led to people post their purchases are leaving reviews which helps the prospective buyer to ascertain the value of the product and whether the product is worth their money or not. This has replaced the age-old practice of word of mouth buying. For example, in a study conducted by University of Melbourne where a group of shoppers were questioned about the confidence in buying a product which they hear from friends or the products which had a good review online about its viability and more than 79% respondents said that their decision for a product would be based on online reviews Thus, the product review help the consumers to reach to a decision.
On the other hand, the growing trend of people making blog posts about the products and their biased reviews are adding to the pile of thousands of posts in relation to a single product. This can be a daunting task for a consumer to look for all the blog posts in order to ascertain the actual review of the product. To cite an example, there are many Personal relations firm which is now buying the bloggers to write paid reviews for their products and all many social media influencers can be seen as branding their products without an iota of truth in their claims. Therefore, this makes it difficult for consumers to gather the actual reviews of the product which is, in turn, a bad thing.
In conclusion, there being no proper method to ascertain the truth behind the genuinity of the review. As such, it is better for the consumers to read about the products and then base their decision after seeing the product on the display. It will be a better alternate to try it out before one buys the product.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...its and flaws. I feel that is both good as well as a bad thing. On the one hand, the t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, i feel, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1732.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56992084433 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38298456501 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480211081794 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.5451220832 49.4020404114 181% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.466666667 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2666666667 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332067498414 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105690936286 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869491294102 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19775404571 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485766729909 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.