Technological revolution in this millennium lead to many inventions like washing machines, automatic appliances which made our lives easier like never before. In this context, few people argue that sophisticated gadgets, which were supposed to be user friendly, made them only more difficult. However, I completely disagree with the statement as myself a beneficiary of these equipments. In this essay, we are going to discuss various application of modern goods with examples and the way they are bringing difference in our mundane lifestyle.
Earlier, communication was a big challenge in every sector. Whereas, thanks to phones and computers, these days transferring data or information is matter of seconds. Similarly domestic activities, whether washing clothes or dishes, is herculean task for homemakers.
Because of electric machines these household chores are now just simple and effective. Likewise, from official to personal services these tools are ubiquitous. For instance, Laptop a device is used alike in houses and corporate offices.As this being the case, there is no veracity in the argument to say that these gadgets are making our jobs harder. In my opinion, it's only lack of understanding while using them complicates the matter. Nevertheless, all manufacturers are installing a handbook or customer contact number for queries or consultancy.
On the other hand scientific innovations are known for their simplicity and accurate execution of assignments. Infact, many instruments are used for verifying human mistakes. For instance, bar code detectors installed in industries to check flaws in packing have perfect record. Therefore, with their prudent functioning capacity it's unlikely for them to increase stress in us. Moreover, for risk free assessment
digital handsets are recommended. Hence, there is no reason to believe that proliferating usage of technological supplements cause of stress. On contrary, researches suggest that approximately 12% anxiety cases are reduced due to incorporation of softwares in routine checks. Ofcourse one or two odd cases, like hacking, happen here and there affecting the scenario and outlook cautioning us their negative effects. Nonetheless, those glitches are temporary and can be avoided with upgrading to ondate services.
Keeping in view of discussions on subject matter, I re assert my support on scientific innovations and their necessity in our everyday occupations. In a nutshell, advanced machineries can only bring us more comfort if they are harnessed in proper direction. Otherwise, like any other aspect too much of it can do more harm.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...ta or information is matter of seconds. Similarly domestic activities, whether washing cl...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 237, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...d alike in houses and corporate offices.As this being the case, there is no veraci...
^^
Line 6, column 413, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n us. Moreover, for risk free assessment digital handsets are recommended. Hence,...
^^^
Line 7, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...roximately 12% anxiety cases are reduced due to incorporation of softwares in rou...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, likewise, look, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, similarly, so, therefore, whereas, while, for instance, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2230.0 1615.20841683 138% => OK
No of words: 397.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61712846348 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09338564735 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 176.041082164 151% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670025188917 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 716.4 506.74238477 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.78454497 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.9166666667 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5416666667 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.04166666667 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147877203426 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0318788591255 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389731358327 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.062605184787 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053838998291 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.02 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 154.0 78.4519038076 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.