You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic:
In some countries it is now illegal to reject someone applying for a job because of his or her age.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.
Write at least 250 words.
Currently there is a contentious argument over creation of a law that makes it illegal to reject someone for a job based upon their age in some countries. Age of a person is a critical deciding factor for grabbing certain roles in the company. I this that this is a negative development to make it illegal to reject job applicant based on age. In this essay I will discuss why I think it to be a negative development.
Beyond any qualms there are myriads of rationale reasons that prove that rejecting an applicant based on his age is totally valid. Different jobs require different skills which are constantly changing with age be it looks, physical stamina, learning ability. For instance, the job of a weight trainer requires lifting heavy loads so it is rationale to reject a senior citizen for this role. A modeling career is rare after age of fifty. For example, when Indian rural banks shifted to computer based data collection from document based it was the fresh graduates who were aware of latest technological developments and shouldered the responsibility well.
On the contrary, some people think that senior citizens are not preferred for any job because of job rejection based on age. I believe that this is not true because experiential learning is gained with age and there are certain roles on management and administrative level that requires senior citizens. For instance, Alibaba group chairman Jack Maa always quotes that twenties is the age of learning and post forty is the age group to employee young employees to work for you.
In conclusion, I believe that rejecting an employee based on his/her age is totally valid and the government of any country should not make these kinds of irrational laws that abolish the companies to select the suitable employees based on age along with other important criteria.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-15 | ankita.hpgdc | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-15 | ankita.hpgdc | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-15 | ankita.hpgdc | 56 | view |
- As people live longer and longer the idea of cloning human beings in order to provide spare parts is becoming a reality The idea horrifies most people yet it is no longer mere science fiction To what extent do you agree with such a procedure Have you any 81
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- It was predicted that people in the 21st century would have much more free time than in the past To what extent has this prediction come true 73
- With the rise of e books comes the decline in paper books Some people see it as a good step forward while others do not What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend 82
- Some people think that it is better to educate boys and girls in separate schools Other however believe that boys and girls benefit more from attending mixed schools Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 578, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the latest'.
Suggestion: of the latest
... was the fresh graduates who were aware of latest technological developments and shoulder...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, well, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93548387097 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73063325265 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529032258065 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9762280324 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.692307692 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8461538462 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301109124737 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11756640895 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706487317466 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19081165764 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729899231227 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.