In recent years, zoos seem to have become an indispensable part of our cities. Some assert that keeping animals in zoos is inhumane, while others argue otherwise. From my perspective, it is necessary to open a zoo although we need to face a few drawbacks.
Admittedly, it seems difficult to refute the idea that zoos have negative impacts on wildlife. First of all, keeping animals in captivity actually violates animals’ rights, because they belong in their natural habitats which give them freedom of action. Second, animals may be tortured by keepers in order to domesticate them. Last but not least, the long-term feeding practice will deprive animals of their ability to survive in the wild environment. However, this does not necessarily mean that we need to close down zoos. For these reasons, there does seem to be a solid basis for the claim that abolishing the system of zoos is necessary.
On the other hand, it seems short-sighted to contend that zoos merely take a toll on animals. In fact, the existence of zoos plays an important role in education and protection of endangered animals. First and foremost, zoos give people an opportunity to satisfy their curiosity about animals that they have never seen, thus enhancing public understanding of wildlife. For example, children can witness what whales look like and know the significant role this biggest mammal plays in the ecosystem. What’s more, they will keep watching how whales eat or sleep. After people clear up their confusions, they may share their discovery with their friends, flaunting the extent to which they know about the animal they have learned from the zoo. Therefore, zoos create an environment conducive to increasing people’s knowledge of animals.
In addition, zoos can preserve species vulnerable to extinction. The reason why they face extinction is that they are unable to adapt to the wild environment by themselves. Therefore, if humans did not intervene with their destiny, they would be doomed to vanish from the earth. For instance, the population of Chinese pandas was only 1,114 in 1980 because of the decrease of bamboo. Hence, the Chinese government listed pandas as national first-class protected animals and took pandas to zoos in order to prevent them from extinction. Afterwards, the population of pandas increased to 2,400 in 2021.
In conclusion, both of these two views have their pros and cons, but still, I maintain that zoos are integral part of our society, as its benefits outweigh the rest.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, hence, however, if, look, may, second, so, still, therefore, thus, while, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2103.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 411.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11678832117 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70356485217 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 176.041082164 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574209245742 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 640.8 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9800915564 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4347826087 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8695652174 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.60869565217 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138564327759 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398763551697 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0273485982554 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0723175759383 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027290869998 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.