137) Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? High schools should allow students to study the courses that students want to study. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
Educational system has significantly improved during the last century by introducing a great variety of fields. While some consider that high school students should study pr-established courses, others believe that scholars should have the chance to opt for what they want. I agree with the latter opinion, due to the fact that students can focus on what they are interested in, and and because it prevents from wasting time. I will explain my statement in detail, in the following essay.
First and foremost, students should focus on domains they are passionate about, because these can be decisive for their future. Adults say that pupils are not aware or they do not know what is good for them, but by that age most know what domains are attractive for them. Moreover, forcing scholars to take useless classes is not a wise idea, as they will not accord too much attention to them. Furthermore, their grades might be lower, and consequently their chances to enter a prestigious university decrease considerably. For instance, I had to study Latin, a dead language, for five years. What this brought to me? Well, absolutely nothing. After spending five years studying it, I was not able to speak it and nor were my colleagues, and consequently all of us had low grades. As a result, our final results were reduced by the bad marks.
To continue with, learning about irrelevant things is a totally waste of time, both for teachers and for students. In other words, teachers are disappointed when they notice that students show no interest in their work, and students do not add anything to their know-how. In addition, some classes require skills and talents, but unfortunately there are scholars who do not owe them. My experience is a compelling example of this. Back in middle school, I had to study painting and music, and I soon realized that I had no talent. I struggled a lot during this time and I hoped not to study them ever again. Sadly, my high school schedule included both of them, and even though I talk with the principle and explain her that I am not gifted at arts, she rejected my request to choose alternative courses. Thus, I had to spend eight years and hundreds of hours on learning things that I could not excel in.
To summarize, high school pupils should definitely be allowed to select their classes. This is because they have the opportunity to elect beneficial domains for their future and because it is a way to avoid loosing time on unrelated fields.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 380, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...n focus on what they are interested in, and and because it prevents from wasting time. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 55, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('totally') instead an adjective, or a noun ('waste') instead of another adjective.
...th, learning about irrelevant things is a totally waste of time, both for teachers and for stud...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2063.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80885780886 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62470034405 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559440559441 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2951093325 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6956521739 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.652173913 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.65217391304 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173781198018 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0453106987701 0.076458572812 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521073087104 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117271582319 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671226454573 0.0645574589148 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.