5 Aug: Many companies provide important products or services, but also damage the environment. Some people believe that the best way to stop companies from harming the environment is to require them to pay a penalty such as higher tax or a large fine when they cause environmental damage. Other people think there are better ways to stop the companies from harming the environment. Which view do you agree with and why?
Many environmentalists have perennially been considered the issue of environment maintenance which it has a prominent role in people’s lives. In addition, many companies are contaminating the environment with their products processes. Unlike some people may hold the viewpoint that the government should punish them by higher tax or a larger fine, I highly concur with the idea that there are some other ways to encourage them not damaging the environment. The following paragraphs will aptly elucidate my perspective through some significant arguments.
To begin with, the government should encourage them to prevent releasing their sewage in the environment by decreasing tax rather than increasing. In fact, companies would find out it would be an interesting idea to enhance their profits by saving some parts of the tax money. Therefore, the more maintenance of environment, the more profits they can have. Take Irankhodro Company, one of the most popular automobile company in Iran, into consideration as an illustration. Now that this company regards severely environmental issue, it was exempted from paying any tax by the government last year. Consequently, this gift brought them saving money in the amount of approximately 1 billion dollars.
Another vital point should be taken into consideration is the fact that the purifier would help companies to stop harming the environment. As long as the cost of purifier would be high and unaffordable for companies, the government must provide them some facilities to encourage them to supply their company by these instruments. For instance, Parliament of Iran has put a regulation that government should allocate some parts of budgets for this purpose.
Last but not the least, the government could introduce some companies strongly following the rules of environmental conservation as the best supporter of our environment. On the other hand, they would be known as great companies by this advertising. Take McDonald to elaborate this point. Respecting to the environment, in fact, is one of the most important of features, so it has been known rapidly throughout the world.
To conclude this perspective from the aforementioned points, they can be found other encouraging ways to prevent companies from releasing their sewage into environment. Not only can government reduce the amount of tax, but they can also provide them some facilities to use the purifier in their companies. Besides, the best supporter of environment would be introduced through people, which it can help them to improve their business.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 435, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an help them to improve their business.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, if, may, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, in fact, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 8.0752688172 347% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2178.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 402.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41791044776 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13537848633 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 675.0 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6429575695 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.9 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30301237241 0.236089414692 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891921632103 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584862892131 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175936827194 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469802322261 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.