The ability to maintain friendships with small number of people over a long period of time is more important than the ability to make many new friends easily.
Do you agree or disagree with the statement?
Friends are really a crucial part of our lives. Some people have ability to make many new friends while some believe in quality of friends rather than the quantity. I fall in the category who highly believes in making few friends but the real ones. I feel this way for two main reasons that I will be dealing further.
To begin with, little number of friends who have been with us for long period of time can be our companion during hard times. For me, friends are not only the people to share happiness. In fact, they play a major role in every aspect of life and even more during our bad days. In that context, making new friends is not going to help us during those times while our few real ones who have been with us for long time can be there in every ups and downs of life. My own experience can be a compelling example for this. Few years back I passed through a heartbreaking loss of a family member and almost got into depression. I had so many friends but I used to feel alone and depressed. Those time my school friend who has been with me for almost 10 years helped me to get over. Otherwise, I would have gone into depression even in the crowd of friends. Consequently, I realized being with a true friend is far better than being in crowd and feel lonely.
Secondly, the friend with whom we have a long relationship knows and understands us better. In fact, they understand us even better than ourselves sometimes. We can easily trust them and make decisions with their consult that makes a huge difference in life. Whereas, trusting and relying on the new or many people can be really harmful to us. As I mentioned above, my depression was causing a great obstacle in my decision making about whether to move onto university or start doing job. It was difficult for me to decide and no one understood my dilemma. But a friend who knew me from many years understood me quite well and suggested me to not waste time and apply for university. It helped me a lot as I graduated soon and found a better job.
In conclusion, I strongly from my own experiences believe in making few but quality of friends rather than quantity of them because they understand us better and we can rely on them for happiness and sadness equally.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-12 | ReihanehM | 70 | view |
| 2018-08-17 | TOEFL girl | 70 | view |
- Soon technology will provide smart cars that virtually drives themselves. A computer in the car determines the speed and route to the desired destination. The computer is in continuous contact with a global positioning system and other technologies that w 80
- The ability to maintain friendships with small number of people over a long period of time is more important than the ability to make many new friends easily.Do you agree or disagree with the statement? 70
- Do you agree or siagree with the statement?Government should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... friends who have been with us for long period of time can be our companion during hard times....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, really, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, while, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1833.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.42753623188 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41813981662 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497584541063 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 572.4 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5375971956 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.6956521739 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21739130435 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238132739993 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694908962821 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645259285499 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142960278006 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560437352495 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 11.7677419355 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.12 10.9000537634 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.