airships vs airplane | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics:

airships vs airplane

The reading and the lecture are both talking about the Airships. The author of the reading claim that airships are going to increase in the future again for several reasons. For instance, Airships consume less fuel than airplanes, due to they need it only on horizontal movement. Moreover, they are capable of load more heavy weight than airplanes and they will going to replace satellites in the future; hence, they can be used as the same functions with mush less coast. In contrast, the lecturer challenge these claims with the following reasons.

To begin with, the airships consume less fuel. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer since he argues that hydrogen can get easily fire; therefore, it has a very dangerous impact. In addition, helium is safer than hydrogen but it is not effective as hydrogen. For illustrate, helium has less power to left the airships than hydrogen.

Furthermore, the writer suggest that airships have the ability to lift heavy weight than the airplanes and helicopters. However, the man counterclaims that by some reasons. Firstly, airships are not stable enough to land down easy and lift the weight without distortion. For instance, let imagine the balloon land down and lift a tree log without getting effect with wind.

Finally, the author posits that airships are going to be used as satellite. Nevertheless, the lecturer explains that it is not going to happen soon, in view of fact, the airships maximum height is 14000 kilometers. This particular height is very windy; thus, the airships can not be steady in that height. Moreover, they are consuming a lot of fuel and it will be very expensive.

Votes

Essay Categories

Independent TOEFL Writing

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 321, Rule ID: HEAVY_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'heavyweight'?
Suggestion: heavyweight
...Moreover, they are capable of load more heavy weight than airplanes and they will going to r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 363, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'go'
Suggestion: go
...avy weight than airplanes and they will going to replace satellites in the future; he...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 72, Rule ID: HEAVY_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'heavyweight'?
Suggestion: heavyweight
... that airships have the ability to lift heavy weight than the airplanes and helicopters. How...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in addition, in contrast, talking about, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1977.66487455 70% => OK
No of words: 276.0 407.700716846 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03260869565 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57700915025 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 212.727598566 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 618.680645161 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9278400211 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.7058823529 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2352941176 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3529411765 5.45110844103 190% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190628238861 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064697098632 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622848410265 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115639144149 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0212033889078 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 86.8835125448 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.