all students and professor take place face-to-face with other
There have been pros and cons regarding the argument that all students and professor take place face-to-face with other .
While both sides may have their own reason to support their argument, I would strongly agree that all students and professor take place face-to-face with other . There are several reasons and examples as follows.
To start with, taking place face-to-face with other is a great way for students and professor to broaden perspective on the real world.
This is attributed to the fact that it offers opportunities for students and professor to have a balanced view point and get-up-to date knowledge.
Over the decades, today’s rat-race society has been changing and evolving at a surprising speed with such a hectic life style .
Therefore, they are hard pressed for time and feel depressed or drained by the increasing amount of work such as research or homework.
However, in this context, many of students and professor would like to expand and widen our intellectual horizons through
students and professor learning most effectively because they take place face-to-face with other, which makes students and professor think differently about multiple things.
This is because it allows students and professor to look outside the box and approach things in a different way.
Thus, this proves that all students and professor take place face-to-face with other
All things considered it is my belief that regarding this topic has been effectively and precisely with the reasons mentioned above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...essor take place face-to-face with other . While both sides may have their own re...
^^
Line 2, column 160, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...essor take place face-to-face with other . There are several reasons and examples ...
^^
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and examples as follows. To start with, taking place face-to-face with other is ...
^^
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...sing speed with such a hectic life style . Therefore, they are hard pressed for t...
^^
Line 7, column 122, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... widen our intellectual horizons through students and professor learning most eff...
^^^^
Line 8, column 111, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ace face-to-face with other, which makes students and professor think differently...
^^
Line 9, column 26, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tiple things. This is because it allows students and professor to look outside t...
^^
Line 9, column 95, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ook outside the box and approach things in a different way. Thus, this proves that all students a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...essor take place face-to-face with other All things considered it is my belief th...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, may, regarding, so, therefore, thus, while, such as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1292.0 1977.66487455 65% => OK
No of words: 240.0 407.700716846 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38333333333 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.48103885553 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76258917166 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 212.727598566 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 618.680645161 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.6003584229 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3031594788 48.9658058833 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.2 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.45110844103 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 11.0 4.53405017921 243% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.692809480153 0.236089414692 293% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.302339927391 0.076458572812 395% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.266280155345 0.0737576698707 361% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.316592992881 0.150856017488 210% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.28873492903 0.0645574589148 447% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 11.7677419355 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.