Undoubtedly, since there have been seen several advanced developments in the society, modern life is more sophisticated than the past, and people should learn various skills to cope with each aspect of their life. One of the most essential ability required in this hectic era, is planning and organizing. When it comes to this point, many parents want to know whether their young children need to have such ability before their entrance to the whole society or not. I personally believe that planning ability is at the zenith of requirements which each young people has to know. In what follows, I will delve into couple of reasons to shed light on my response.
First reason that comes into my mind is that ability to be flexible in decision-making processes should be learnt in young ages. In general, people always face with inconsistent conditions, in which everything may happen at each period. Each person needs to have lots of scenarios for each situation, if s/he does not want to get shocked during viable changes. Planning process requires a broadened horizon which counts as an essential part of each person's characteristic, and need to be developed since young ages. Based on a research done by psychology department of Shahid Beheshti University of Iran, approximately 50 to 60 percent of each human being's attitudes were learnt whenever s/he was a child. We can conclude that ability to plan and organize, as one of these attitudes, should be started to teach by parents and other neighboring people of a child since childhood.
Second, should it be important for young people to have the ability to plan, as they grow up, this special skill will be developed and becomes a useful skill for their future. People, who have invested on learning these skills, try to practice them in the real life. As this process goes on, they will find out the bugs of each plan they have created. The more the time taken for practicing and debugging the plans, the more the experience taken by people. Thus, if this cycle has been started from the young ages, children have more time for debugging and developing their own methods. As a result, they may have better future life with lots of experience regarding planning and organizing. As I remember, when I was a fourteen-years-old child, my father always took tests from me, in which I should pick one object from many options in front. As I grew up, I learnt a method to find out which one is the best, and spent my time on debugging this created method. Now, whenever I think about effects of this behavior, I just come to the point that if this learning process started later, never do I see the effects on my current planning method.
To recapitulate, we can conclude that it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize to deal with the complexity of this modern life. It is because not only being flexibility should be learnt in young ages but also, this special skill has more time to be developed and debugged. I strongly propose that each parent starts to teach these useful skills to their young children during their childhood.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 845, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... one object from many options in front. As I grew up, I learnt a method to find ou...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, regarding, second, so, thus, as to, i think, in general, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 85.0 52.1666666667 163% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2581.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 540.0 407.700716846 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77962962963 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82057051367 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61092132223 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468518518519 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 792.0 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 12.0 3.51792114695 341% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8288306252 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.217391304 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4782608696 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13043478261 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323215408133 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0999361922921 0.076458572812 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103643023839 0.0737576698707 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226932267026 0.150856017488 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606982611825 0.0645574589148 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.