The best way to reduce air pollution is for the government to raise the cost of fuel (petrol).
With winter approaching, every person living in Beijing city has to wear a thick mask when they want to hang out. As we all know, there are many cities around the world today which have a severe problem in air pollution like Beijing. Governments should take action without any waiting. Some experts suggest that government raise the price of fuel to reduce the emission of pollutants in order to solve the air pollution problem. According to my perspective, however, it will not work out.
First of all, people will not stop buying petrol even if its price is higher than before. Nowadays, almost every family in the city has at least one car. Cars become indispensable for human beings because life is truly conveniently with a car. In this case, although the price of gas is increasing, drivers who have to drive cars have no other choice but continue buying expensive petrol, so the demand for fuel would not decrease that much. That is to say, the pollutants are stilled discharged to air. Therefore, raising up fuel price helps little to improve air quality.
Secondly, raising gas price will obstruct economic development. Since people do need fuel to drive their vehicle, the more expensive petrol will be a burden for them. As mentioned, the need for gas is not declining, so people have to pay more for daily transportation, which is definitely harmful to their interests. Before raising the price, people can use this money to buy some goods, travel on vacation or pay for education, but now they have no extra money to do these all kinds of things. Thus, it will cause a huge loss in the economic.
In addition, there are many other ways to reduce air pollution effectively. For example, the government should invest money in discovering and researching clean energy which can be the substitute for fuel. People can use these energies, like wind energy, solar energy or water energy, to drive their cars. In this way, the mission of carbon dioxide and other harmful chemical compositions produced by burning petrol can decrease tremendously. On the other hand, air pollution can also be forestalled by protesting forest. Numerous trees are planted around Beijing as a protective screen to sands wind. In actual fact, it is useful. Therefore, air pollution problem can be solved gradually.
In conclusion, raising gas price not only cannot solve pollution problem but also damage citizens’ interests. Keep in mind that there are other methods, like finding clean energy, to reduce air pollutants. Governments should not modulate a goods’ price without full consideration.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 606, Rule ID: ACTUAL_EXPERIENCE[1]
Message: Use simply 'fact'.
Suggestion: fact
...s a protective screen to sands wind. In actual fact, it is useful. Therefore, air pollution...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, as to, at least, for example, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2175.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 431.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0464037123 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68448784439 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54060324826 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.94265232975 283% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8187594945 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.5555555556 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.962962963 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.74074074074 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333732966751 0.236089414692 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0862067937967 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083555662765 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183123228471 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419295956845 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.