No one can deny that modern technology along with facilities and more reliable life also provide some serious issues specially related to pollution and climate variation. This is the fact that with updated version of automobiles everyone would like to travel via their personal vehicle. It is without a shadow of doubt that burning of fuel produce a lot of poison mixture of gases. Although highly used petrolium is the main cause of air pollution, but this is not right solution to increase the cost of fuels. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, the most cardinal factor to use petrol is the consuming of fuel in vehicle not petrol itself. There are many other source of energy too,like electric energy,coal,solar energy etc. In my view the best way to reduce the use of petrol is to provide these energy resources at less cost. On the too of this there is requirement of modification in the engine of automobiles. According to a survey people in Thiland use sugarcane to produce fuel which is pollution free almost no emission of methane and carbon dioxide.
Moreover, the other step toward reduction of air pollution is to get aware public about pollution and realize them that its your duty how to maintain your nation very well. Not only the burning of fuels produce air pollution but other factor also, such as burning of plastic, and waste haystack in farmland etc. For the next upcoming month in most part of India, people will burn leftover from the rice farming instead of making decomposed compost. The government can enforce the law to stop these burning as well as by reducing the use of vehicle that consumed petrol. My own experience is the evidence of this. Five years ago, the prime minister made a rule to use vehicle with name plate on the basis of even-odd on alternative day. I was lucky that my neighour having odd number plane and mine was even so it was reliable for both of us to share car.
In conclusion, In my opinion the best way to reduce air pollution is to encourage pupil to use another energy sources by providing them with less cost than petrol as well as by spreading awareness among people to avoid burning of plastic and other material. Moreover by implimentation of strict rule
against using less personal vehicle.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'sources'?
Suggestion: sources
...not petrol itself. There are many other source of energy too,like electric energy,coal...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , like
...here are many other source of energy too,like electric energy,coal,solar energy etc. ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , coal
...ource of energy too,like electric energy,coal,solar energy etc. In my view the best w...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 121, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...c about pollution and realize them that its your duty how to maintain your nation v...
^^^
Line 7, column 259, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
... burning of plastic and other material. Moreover by implimentation of strict rule agai...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 300, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oreover by implimentation of strict rule against using less personal vehicle. ...
^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... against using less personal vehicle.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, well, even so, i feel, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1920.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74074074074 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52926055788 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558024691358 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8966187055 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.052631579 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3157894737 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73684210526 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294139678867 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751816567404 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077400138444 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14705696085 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0824665987928 0.0645574589148 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.