Since the dawn of industrial revolution, cars played important role in each society. Nowadays, many are adamant that a myriad elements should be taken into consideration to examine its constructive and destructive facets of this issues. Some people may hold the view that they are milestone of humanity and should not be forbidden to use it. Others take an opposite view and consider that it is fallacy. From my vantage point, I concur with the latter group and believe that vehicles such as car, motorcycle, bus is big danger for the future of our planet and using alternatives of cars should be encourage.
The First exquisite point to be mentioned is that government can set up new tax policies which is a huge obstacle on electricity cars or increase current ones to encourage using nature friend vehicles. In fact, If nature friends cars would not be expensive, people prefer to buy them since money has more weight than others. A vivid example which can be given to shed on light to the subject is decreasing tax rates. According to the last research about electricity car shows that individuals especially who have high educate level are willing to buy electricity cars but the cost of it is main obstacle. That is, the sound of buying them is not appeal to educated people. Government should encourage using new cars by lowering taxes or adding only park space place.
In approaching this issue, apart from what mentioned above, there is a subtle point which must be borne in mind. Bicycles are one of most popular transportation among the young and Its importance has skyrocketed compared to the last decades. The young can find an opportunity to make sport due to heavy workload. They can ride bicycles to office and cut cost of transportation. Moreover, Government can reduce traffic by encouraging more office birds to ride to office. Consequently, using bicycles on the one hand helps government by creating more park space and encouraging less car, on the other hand, cut individuals costs.
Although, the aforementioned reasons are the first ones which cross the mind at first glance, there are by no means the only reasons available. A noteworthy refreshingly intelligible statistic revels by a resent research conducted in MIT showed that educated people tend to less drive car since its destructive effect. The research study has conducted between the young people from the same age group in the eleven city in the country. It shows the necessity of increasing education level in order to decrease car using.
In the final analysis, according to what I mentioned body paragraphs above, one cannot deny the fact that the aforementioned topic is a controversial matter of discussion which must be elaborately addressed in order to precisely examine. However, there is authentic evidence which can lead us to this conclusion that countries can reduce car using by tax policies, education, nature friend vehicles.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'element'?
Suggestion: element
...owadays, many are adamant that a myriad elements should be taken into consideration to e...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 225, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... constructive and destructive facets of this issues. Some people may hold the view t...
^^^^
Line 1, column 598, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'encouraged'?
Suggestion: encouraged
...nd using alternatives of cars should be encourage. The First exquisite point to be men...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, apart from, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2456.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 486.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05349794239 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69525374022 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81817598277 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541152263374 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 787.5 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1460152286 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.782608696 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1304347826 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82608695652 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127283932173 0.236089414692 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0367979147577 0.076458572812 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.026340257416 0.0737576698707 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.072469400985 0.150856017488 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181841446741 0.0645574589148 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.