A company is going to give some money either to support the arts or to protect the environment. Which do you think the company should choose? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There are a myriad inventions were crafted by people, which made our life easier. Some of them at the same time have been destroying our planet. If a company is going to give some money to support the arts or to protect evrinonment, I would definitely prefer for a company to protect the environment. There are a few reasons why I feel this way.
First of all, protection of the environment is likely to save our planet from declining. There are scores of factories on the Earth produce harmful chemical substances every day. These chemicals destroy the atmosphere and polute water sources, which contribute to global warming. This, in turn, leads to climat changing, which egregiously affects all creatures on the planet. For example, some of animals simply cannot stand hot weather conditions and die. To that end, if the company to sponsor moving such as animals to other habitats, it can prevent them from extinction.
Secondly, protection of forests gives people places to walk and enjoy the astonishing beauty of them. My own experience illustrates this point very well. I have to walk my dog every day, and I prefer to do it in woods nearby because there I can appreciate fascinating view of the nature, which makes me rested and relaxed. This is salient to me since I have very busy life, and at the end of each day I need something to help me to take a breath and pursue my comlicated way. So, if the woods, next to my house are protected from deforestation, I have the green space to relax.
Finally, speaking of psychological help of woods, clean environment contributes to people`s health in general. Nowadays people, espetialy those leaving in big cities, experience tremendous lack of pure oxigen because polution of the air by vehicles increaces amount of carbone dioxide in the atmosphere. This damages humans` immuno system, and leads to a variety of diseases. For instance, when I was living In Moscow, I had cold more ofthen than I do now, living in a country community , surounded by lakes and forests. This way, the protection of the environment is indispensable for humans` wellbeing.
To sum it up, it is advantageous if the company spends money on protection of the environment. This is because, it provides the future to our planet, gives more green places to people to walk on, and contributes to better health. All things considered, it seems reasonable to assume, that protection of the environment makes life better.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'invention'?
Suggestion: invention
There are a myriad inventions were crafted by people, which made our ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 390, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the animals') or simply say ''some animals''.
Suggestion: some of the animals; some animals
...l creatures on the planet. For example, some of animals simply cannot stand hot weather conditi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 498, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... I do now, living in a country community , surounded by lakes and forests. This wa...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...spensable for humans' wellbeing. To sum it up, it is advantageous if the ...
^^
Line 5, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n of the environment makes life better.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, for instance, i feel, in general, speaking of, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2049.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 417.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91366906475 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87905217323 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558752997602 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 653.4 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4043143333 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0869565217 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1304347826 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08695652174 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187916434125 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522965980256 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0925452745245 0.0737576698707 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117986937852 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102572782928 0.0645574589148 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Try to use less pronouns (like 'It, I, They, We, You...') as the subject of a sentence.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.