When it comes to the issue of the best way of gaining knowledge, some people believe that books are a worthy source of wisdom. However, opponents consider a higher importance level for which is obtained through experience. As far as I am concerned, the second opinion has more edges. Following, I try to consider the pros and cones of both sides and explain my position clearly.
First, let us take look at why the first group chooses the book as an important way of getting knowledge. They are inclined to believe that we can know about many things from books while obtaining them from experience surely time-consuming and difficult. I partially consent their reasons but we should know that what is written in the books base on the experience.
Second, the information is obtained through experience is new and more effective. I think a small example may give some light on this issue. I have taught chemistry in high schools since ten years ago. As long as I had associated with students, I found out they better catch the chemical reactions process in the laboratory because they utilize all their senses ( touch, sight, taste, smell, hearing) for understanding. I think that if we think about school-time we comprehend that we forget a wide range of theoretical topics while we remember what we gained through experience.
Third, Some of the data can not be learned from books. For instance, if you want to get your driver's license, you should become familiar with plenty of driving rules, road signs, and car functions. You can find a proper book and study about them but it is not sufficient to drive a car. You need to ride a car in the real situation and face real conditions to improve your driver skills.
Taking into account all factors and angles that involved with this hotly-debated matter, we may conclude that experience allows us to learn effectively, new information, and the prime source for knowing about unknown worlds. However, we can not ignore the role of books in humans' progression so far. Last but not least, I hope that the next generations become more eager to comprehend more.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 362, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ry because they utilize all their senses touch, sight, taste, smell, hearing for ...
^^
Line 7, column 8, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...e gained through experience. Third, Some of the data can not be learned from books. For...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, may, second, so, third, while, for instance, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1757.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 362.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85359116022 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65569053647 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599447513812 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9091360657 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4736842105 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0526315789 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36842105263 5.45110844103 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17003621023 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460054874534 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408826347142 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0866989222113 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.02383981773 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.