Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of living in a large city versus living in a small town. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There is a huge debate whether live in an urban or in a countryside area more advantageous or not. Some people argue that lives close to the city provide proximity to convenient, modern, and lavish facilities. Furthermore, the urban lifestyle offer variation of ethnics and cultures that contributes to the eclectic environment. In the other hand, rural area gives the dweller a calm, rustic, and comfortable surrounding with open space to do outdoor sports and activities. Additionally, the amiable people befitting a close knit connection. Nevertheless, I personally believe that living in the large city is more appropriate for me after comparing both of the places.
One thing to consider, the countryside is suitable for more laidback personality. The place serves an enormous vacant land or nature wonders that entice people from the city. Albeit, without numerous skyscrapers, the small town enable the citizen to playing a canoe in the river, hiking to the mountain or built a huge back yard. Moreover, the relax nuance made people feel less rushed and stress because of the calm environment. In addition, The people seems more warmth than the city dwellers. Without busy schedule, they most likely relax and spend their time to confer to each other.
At the same time, staying in the small town has several setbacks too. The distance from the capital city makes the rural area less informed about technologies. Consequently, this will affect the people especially for the medical intervention since they most likely get obsolete management. The small town population also faces lack of infrastructure development. As a consequences of nature obstacle or simply because of there is no human resources to do the job.
In contrast, living in a big city offer more convenient life style. The people enjoy modern and acme of facilities especially in health service and communication technologies. Another key point is the people in the city come from everywhere thus the amalgam of culture. For instance, the Silicon Valley area most likely adopts faster internet connection than lets say Portland hence the capability to support the update for phone application. In addition, New York will have more expertise in surgery instead of Oregon. Of course, there is drawback for living in the city such as the expensive living cost, and lack of open space. Nevertheless, with all the advantageous the big city offered, I believe it is charming enough to attract people live there for the rest of their live.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 342, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...n or built a huge back yard. Moreover, the relax nuance made people feel less rushed and...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 367, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a consequence' or simply 'consequences'?
Suggestion: a consequence; consequences
... lack of infrastructure development. As a consequences of nature obstacle or simply because of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 783, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... live there for the rest of their live.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, well, for instance, in addition, in contrast, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 43.0788530466 30% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2108.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 408.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84842307831 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563725490196 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 11.0 3.08781362007 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.4514666679 48.9658058833 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8333333333 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191256585478 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521680723375 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620660056479 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112412050201 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552462369921 0.0645574589148 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.