The reading passage proposes three reasons for colonization in an asteroid. However, the professor opposes these claims and suggests that all of them are impractical. In the lecture, he uses three points to support his idea.
Firstly, the passage contends that it is safer and easier to land in or take off on the asteroid due to the lower gravity. On the contrary, the professor contends that such lower gravity would cause some serious problems in the long term. For instance, according to the professor, the loss of bone density and the muscle mass will lead to severe health problems on the human\\\'s body. This is the first point where the lecturer disproves the passage.
Second, while the passage claims that mining valuable metals on an asteroid would be profitable, the professor rebuts it by pointing out that this is not a whole picture. As the professor said, the cost of transporting the metals and supporting such a program may fail to enable the business or colonists to be profitable. Moreover, there is not a guarantee that the market price of metal would remain the same after these valuable metals emerge in the market. This is the second part where the speaker disagrees with the author.
Finally, the author argues that because of the shorter distance with Earth, asteroids very easy to reach. However, the professor refutes it by saying that it may easy to reach but it could be difficult to come back. He maintains that the distance between the asteroid and Earth is not always constant. On the words, the asteroid may be closer to Earth at one certain point but move away from Earth later. Thus, it would be a challenge to return after the asteroid was far away from Earth. This is the last point where the professor contradicts the author.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, thus, while, for instance, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1977.66487455 74% => OK
No of words: 305.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81639344262 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44603348654 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534426229508 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.618906781 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4117647059 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9411764706 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58823529412 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0469066831706 0.236089414692 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.018457147284 0.076458572812 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0273484790887 0.0737576698707 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0310233103326 0.150856017488 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.01087521965 0.0645574589148 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.