Historical thinking is always be concerned by a lot of people who struggling in the field of teaching. Some inviduals think let students learn history is an effective way for them to understand world and expand their visions. Nevertheless, I think it is unnessesary for university require all students to attend history classes. I will elaborate on my disccusion for three reasons.
First and foremost, all students will develop their historical comprehence in college by themselves, the additional history courses will disrupt their plan in study. As we all know, universities' students have effective ways to get understand what have been going on in our world and society, their curiousities are enough to promote them to learn history in our llves. Universities' requirements about the appointment for all students to attend the history courses will reduce them passion in study and eventually, they will get frustrated with additional class in historical field. Take an architecture department in a university for account, a student has already learnt about how the Roman architectural figures, he will be relactant to join a history class that just repeat teaching Roman art history again and again.
Secondly, the resources for scheduling history classes in a university is too many, they should be used in to more important field in school. Once a university wants to have a whole educational cirrumustance for all students, it will be a unbelievable thing for financial department in the university. On the other hand, even we have abundant budget for financial support in college, it is not fair for history teachers, they already have enough educate plan in their research fields and need to explore more history finding such as old masterpieces. To prepare a set of courses for all students in the university is impossible for them, or they will suffer from more work in weekends and holidays.
Finally, some people will hold an understanding that students need to conprehence history to make their visions more expanded. It is somewhat useful to students if they attend history courses in their school lives. However, in today's fast-changing world, getting knowledge about past is just a single aspect of all judgements to a sccessful people. Students need their time to do whatever they want and explore more things in their lives. A healthy society needs intelligent people in all field, which can give the best improvement for itself instead of just collects all experts in history.
In conclusion, a teaching schedule need to be talking or debating many times before it used by all universities in our society, it needs more conversations and communications, so it's hard to give such an excellent understanding. Nevertheless, I do think that universities don't need to require all students to attend history classes. I will elaborate on my disccusion for three reasons, students need more time to do what is more important.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...rumustance for all students, it will be a unbelievable thing for financial depart...
^
Line 9, column 273, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ertheless, I do think that universities dont need to require all students to attend ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, i think, in conclusion, of course, such as, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2475.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 477.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18867924528 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01050991853 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471698113208 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 770.4 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.715081681 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.75 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.85 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266528883609 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102446641349 0.076458572812 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532888569412 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168069491705 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321400609144 0.0645574589148 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.