Nowadays, with the development of science and technology, books have decreased and people began to look for e-books. Therefore, some people claim that books are not needed anymore because people can read information on computers. However, I am very opposed to this idea. I will tell you three reasons to support my opinion.
To begin with, paper books have unique charms. Paper books add imagination to some people. E-books are less lively because they just have black letters on the white screen, but each page of paper books makes you wait for the next content and you can imagine or think about it by yourself before you see the next one. In addition, we feel proud when we finish reading one paper book, but e-books are less. Also, for older people, paper feels more comfortable than computers, so there are many people who feel like friends with paper books. For example, my grandmother always buys and reads paper books no matter how many functions e-books have. Thus, the charm of paper books cannot be ignored.
Next, when we look at e-books for a long time, our eyes will hurt. A book usually has over two hundred pages, so you have to read it for two hours at the earliest. Therefore, you need to choose a medium that will irritate your eyes as much as possible so that you can see it for a long time. In this respect, of course, paper books are much better for eye health than e-books. So, if all the paper books are gone, all people will probably live with glasses on, and when reading books, they should read them with concern that they might strain their eyes. For instance, when I read an ebook once before, my eyes hurt even if I read it hard for thirty minutes, but when I read it with a paper book, I can read it for two hours in a row.
Last, older people may find it inconvenient to read books on the computer. Young people may feel a little more comfortable with e-books because they have used computers since they were young, but grandmothers and grandfathers who do not use computers well may find it too difficult to read books in the future if paper books are gone. In fact, my grandmother does not have a computer at home because she can not use it. That is why paper books can not go away even for adults.
This is why I disagree that books are not needed anymore. It is because paper books have many charms, ebooks hurt our eyes and older people may have difficulty with ebooks. That is why people can not get rid of paper books completely yet.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in fact, of course, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2036.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 453.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4944812362 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19176285069 2.67179642975 82% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487858719647 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 620.1 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.873626357 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8333333333 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307246370204 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105639385299 0.076458572812 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675021594521 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212387478844 0.150856017488 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581726730795 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.69 8.01818996416 83% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in fact, of course, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2036.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 453.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4944812362 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19176285069 2.67179642975 82% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487858719647 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 620.1 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.873626357 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8333333333 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307246370204 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105639385299 0.076458572812 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675021594521 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212387478844 0.150856017488 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581726730795 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.69 8.01818996416 83% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.