A controversial debate often raised about ways to be a good leader. Some groups of people hold the view that leaders should not consider other's views when making decisions. However, some other groups would hold an opposing view and feel that leaders should be considerate and listen to other people's views. From my vantage point, I concur with the later view and believe that leader should listen to other people's opinion because he or she can make employees motivated and happy.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that employees are happier with leader who listen to them. Employees need to be happy inorder to be productive, without feeling relaxed and happy, they won't be able to give their full energy. In other words, leaders who listen to employees make satisfied while leaders who deny to cooperate with others make them miserable. A vivid example that can illustrate my view point is the experience I had with my previous manager, because he was inconsiderate with my colleagues, many of them quite and join other companies where they feel much happier. Thus, my company did not only lost some employees, but also the talented ones
The second reason which deserves some words is that poor listener leaders leads employee to become de-motivated. Employees need to be always enthusiastic about the work they are doing. without giving them much attention, they lose this enthusiasm. In addition, companies need to realize the good leaders are ones who brings them profits. without leaders giving enough time to employees. profits would slum. Therefore, a good leader is a leader that can listen to others to drive sales and increase profits.
Although the aforementioned reason are the first to cross my mind at a glance, they are by no means the only reasons available. In fact, There is another subtle reason which deserves some words. The noteworthy, refreshing, intelligible study that was public in the business week Journal which showed that leaders who listen to employees bring twice as much profit to there companies than their peers. This study was conducted on 120 top leading companies in different industries to prevent any bias.
To wrap, contemplating the aforementioned reason, one realizes that quality leaders are the leaders are not only the one who bring profits to companies, but also the one who listen to employees and make them happy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 318, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'deny cooperating'.
Suggestion: deny cooperating
...loyees make satisfied while leaders who deny to cooperate with others make them miserable. A viv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 623, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'did' requires base form of the verb: 'lose'
Suggestion: lose
... happier. Thus, my company did not only lost some employees, but also the talented o...
^^^^
Line 4, column 186, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Without
...usiastic about the work they are doing. without giving them much attention, they lose t...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 339, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Without
...aders are ones who brings them profits. without leaders giving enough time to employees...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 388, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Profits
...eaders giving enough time to employees. profits would slum. Therefore, a good leader is...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 68, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aforementioned reason, one realizes that quality leaders are the leaders are not ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, in fact, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.0286738351 199% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1992.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 394.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05583756345 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57961432379 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505076142132 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7358793005 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177964191101 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650387966312 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590676537736 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107420591007 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593621111411 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.