do you agree or disagree with the following statement? the government should support scientific researches even if they are not practical. use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
In today’s modern world, universities and research institutions have a very important part of developing society. For achieving this goal, research is one of the major responsibilities of these establishments. As we know, there are almost infinite areas for research, and there has always been a controversy among the people and authorities whether this is the governments’ duty to support every research in any aspect or not. As far as I am concerned, I believe that governments should only support those kinds of researches that are practical and can directly help the society and people. The reasons why I think so are manifold, but limited financial and human resources are the most significant ones, which will be elaborated upon hereunder.
Any country on the planet has a definite amount of financial resources and even rich countries do not have a limitless amount of money and facilities. With this in mind, I think spending those possibilities on unpractical researches should not be an option or at least a priority. There are more important areas which need money to thrive, and some of them are very important, for instance, eradicating illiteracy especially in faraway places, solving the problem of traffic which causes polluting the environment, providing new jobs for unemployed people, or even solving social problems to name but many. I think these problems are more important and have a direct effect on society and all the people who live in it. Some of them are maybe a matter of death or life. For example, some evidence shows that about twenty thousand people die in Tehran as a result of polluted air. As can be seen, reducing the amount of pollution should be the high priority of the authorities in Tehran.
Also, it is obvious that every country has a certain population, therefore there is a limited amount of human resources. If governments spend too much money on the unpractical issues, as a result, more students will tend to study those aspects. By so doing, a considerable amount of highly educated people will be studying on matters that do not have any uses not only for themselves but also for society. On the other hand, if governments invest in the practical sciences, inevitably students and scholars will become interested in them, and they will focus their researches on the issues that can make differences in the whole society.
In conclusion, I believe that governments have limited resources and they should put their total focus on issues that can be helpful for their country. In my opinion, it is not a wise thing to do that when there are real and urgent problems in a country, waste your money and energy on the issues that are not even practical.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, therefore, as for, at least, even so, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2253.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 456.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94078947368 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84324129207 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497807017544 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 720.9 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.7173641435 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.166666667 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77777777778 5.45110844103 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170057571171 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503201680349 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478652449732 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108318177542 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425598222876 0.0645574589148 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.