Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
A glance at people attitudes toward athletics brings to light a question that has provoked a debate, namely, whether athletics is more important to spend on or arts. Some people may contend that athletics is more vital and keep people healthy. Some gym equipments are too expensive and poor individuals cannot afford them. However, I believe that government should support arts to balance lifestyle.
The foremost reason why I am supporting this idea lies in the fact that not only are art utensil and supplies expensive, but also they can be used for one times and last for limited time. For example, each artist must have different brushes which has excellent quality. No one can use others' brushes and also after one year, those old ones are not usable anymore. While treadmill, mats, balls and other gym equipments can be used for more than one person and stay in good conditions for more than 10 years. Therefore, artists need more support since their budget is tight to buy whatever they need.
Another reason that I should deem is the fact that, leagues support athletics and people pay to watch their games. For example, a basketball mentor normally earns more than half million and private companies are willing to be sponsor for the teams. As a matter of fact, they do not need government assistantship. In contrast, most artist die in bad situation with no money and nobody is interested to buy their pictures or pay to see their performance. People normally buy fake pictures or download music from illegal sources. Hence, art cannot survive without external supports.
Admittedly, some sport field need noticeable funds because of less private support. Although people like to purchase football tickets, they would not pay to watch badminton competition. In these cases, states' governor must dedicate enough budgets to help teams. Nevertheless, they do not need to contribute much money since the equipments are not costly.
Due to aforementioned argument discussed in the previous statements, I strongly recommend to promote art centers and encourage people to participate in art activities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | Take | 70 | view |
| 2023-05-20 | slliland | 90 | view |
| 2023-05-06 | waliwaliwa | 85 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | redark777 | 75 | view |
| 2023-02-11 | Ruuluu9073 | 70 | view |
- If you could change one important thing about your hometown, what would you change? 70
- TPO-41 - Integrated Writing Task Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harm 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons and ex 90
- We can learn more from people at a higher level than us like teachers than from people who are at the same level as us 94
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For the successful development of a country it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children five to ten years old than to spend money on universities Use sp 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 81, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommend promoting'.
Suggestion: recommend promoting
... in the previous statements, I strongly recommend to promote art centers and encourage people to par...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, for example, in contrast, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1773.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 345.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13913043478 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64357678433 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605797101449 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4017379275 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.65 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237004386168 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657303250496 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559142608383 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117880959348 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442974923752 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.