No one can deny that there are both positive and negative aspects of affording university professors with high salaries. Personally, I believe that if the university increases the salaries of professors, the quality of education would improve to high level. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will endeavor to expound upon in the following essay.
To begin with, money is a really big incentive to keep professors focused on their tasks, such as researching and teaching. In this materialistic and modern world, professors must do additional jobs after teaching to meet their families’ demands. By paying professors high payments, the university would prevent them from these obstacles. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my uncle’s experience. About two years ago, he worked as a teacher in small town university, so my uncle had faced some finance problems. That is why he could not concentrate on the teaching of the students. The university director decided to increase salaries to finish this crisis, so my uncle overcame this difficulty. Additionally, having motivated by this advantage, he started to give free courses to students and improved his teaching. As a result, if the university did not enhance the payment of professors, my uncle would work on additional job to solve budget problems.
Secondly, offering handsome salary attracts other prominent professors to join that university. We know in the job market the best company can recruit the most prominent employees is the one who offers the highest paycheck. Similarly, if the universities want to motivate renowned employees, they must provide free accommodation, free transport facilities, flexible working hours, and high salaries. For example, a recent study conducted at Stanford University searched for top hundred universities and their successes. The experiment suggests that most of the universities provide their professors with some opportunities to entice other well-known teachers, so these universities pass the other ones on ranking. Additionally, university would enlarge university tuition because of its popularity, so it would increase the budget of university. Therefore, if the universities pay high to the professors, it would affect well-known professors to come here and start teaching.
Taking everything mentioned into account, I firmly conclude that universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. This is because professors would be more focused on their teachings and the university would increase its budget by attracting popular professors
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 217, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'meeting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'teach' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: meeting
... must do additional jobs after teaching to meet their families' demands. By paying...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, really, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, well, for example, i feel, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2236.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 404.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53465346535 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09859074127 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554455445545 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 703.8 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.3462897602 48.9658058833 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.476190476 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2380952381 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61904761905 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211330199407 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689797808542 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656175297845 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153865127158 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385399012161 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 10.9000537634 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.