Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In nowadays life, education is considered as a valuable asset for every single person. And everyone seeks to achieve a high-quality degree to guarantee the future. However, there are many varied approaches to improve university's quality and its degree, I am in profound agreement in the usefulness of high-salary for professors in the quality of education owing to a couple of reasons among which motivation and concentration are more important.
First, a well-paid job is a significant criterion for producing motivation in every career including teaching in a university. To be more specific, people work based on how much their income is. they do not waste time or energy on a low-paid job and just do it with a tremendous number of errors and mistakes. However, a reasonable income will persuade them to put energy and passion in their work. Our university is a compelling example of this concept. We have to wait minutes for our sleepy professor in the morning and finally, he came without any significant schedule for the day. Not only did he teach his lesson wrong and did not care to children comprehension or questions but also he did not teach the entire book and we got into trouble by the end of the semester. Only after we heard about their minute salary did we get aware of the reason underlaying his lazy, passionless behavior.
Furthermore, significant salary help professors to solve their other personal problems and focus completely on their career. In the ongoing hectic lifestyle, people have a lot of issues which should solve them personally. However, some of those can get solved easily and without wasting time only with money. In fact, university professors have their own family and need to fulfill their demands too. for example, after university allocate more budget to professors income. one of our professors hire a nurse for his little daughter and had more time to concentrate on students lesson. He had to monitor his little child personally before this event.
To summarize, for having a high-quality education system in universities we should satisfy these valuable instructors for which paying a high salary seems to be a reasonable approach. Since it makes them more concentrate on their job by solving other personal problems and became more passionate to do their task accurately.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: IN_NOWADAYS[1]
Message: nowadays is used without 'in'. Use simply: 'nowadays'.
Suggestion: Nowadays
In nowadays life, education is considered as a valu...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 240, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this can' or 'those cans'?
Suggestion: this can; those cans
...solve them personally. However, some of those can get solved easily and without wasting t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 402, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
... and need to fulfill their demands too. for example, after university allocate more...
^^^
Line 5, column 475, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...ocate more budget to professors income. one of our professors hire a nurse for his ...
^^^
Line 5, column 570, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ter and had more time to concentrate on students lesson. He had to monitor his little ch...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, well, for example, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1946.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 384.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06770833333 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86205854644 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5546875 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 640.8 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8776445109 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141664016044 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0449330178275 0.076458572812 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501889270943 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0995590771017 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268363720044 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.