Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In every country, universities are thought of as one of the most influential bodies in the society as they shape the future leaders and provide the education that can have major impacts on the country’s future. Needless to say, the professors and lecturers have the biggest role in these academic centers. In this regard, there is a controversy concerning the salary of these key players. Though many think that professors are already paid an adequate amount for their work, I have to disagree, positing that I believe they should be entitled to higher wages for their influential roles in the society. In the paragraphs below, I will provide some reasons that will substantiate my viewpoint.
It goes without doubt that the professors determine the direction of the future of academics in a country. To this regard, if these professors feel they are underpaid for the hard, significant work they do, they will lose their inclination to thrive in the sciences. This sense of dissatisfaction will decline their motives to create new research ideas and social proposals, thus decreasing their proficiency. It is evident what a catastrophic effect this lost tendency will have for a country’s future. An excellent example to this I believe can be the current academic status of my country, Iran. Many professors feel their salaries are not in accordance with their high education, influential social status and work. Thus, they have lost their interest in research and are inclined to pursue off-campus jobs which will have better revenues for them. So it is evident that an increase in salary will result in more motivated and better working professors, consequently insuring the future of a country.
Another point worth mentioning in this regard is that many professors can freely fund research studies out of their own salary and provide a more practical environment for their students is they are paid more generously. A simple stroll through history will prove that there have always been many key research projects that have failed to over win committees in charge of funding. Many of these studies have been able to carry on because the professor in charge was able to pay for the prerequisites of the research team from his/her own salary. To this regard, I believe higher salaries will result in a wide spectrum of studies done freely by professors which can in turn have major academic and social impacts.
Although, it should be mentioned that a balance should be maintained between how a university allocates its money. If a higher pay check for professors will result in less mandatory utilities, laboratory equipment, computers, science and sports tournament and other necessary requirements for the university, it can have adverse impacts.
In general, it can be stated that satisfied professors will lead more sophisticated research studies, which will raise the social and academic status of a country. Although keeping a balance between various parts of university in need of money is crucial, I believe rewarding professors with higher salaries will encourage them to thrive and open doors to astounding scientific discoveries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 714, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...have major academic and social impacts. Although, it should be mentioned that a balance ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, so, thus, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 9.8082437276 234% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2651.0 1977.66487455 134% => OK
No of words: 510.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19803921569 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75217629947 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84734576958 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470588235294 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 828.0 618.680645161 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1537265007 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.238095238 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.80952380952 5.45110844103 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0751492096401 0.236089414692 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.028421750747 0.076458572812 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375534733804 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0546858290493 0.150856017488 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0231246962157 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.