Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Along with the inflation of the economy, since the growth of salary cannot catch up with the inflation, more and more people started complaining that their salaries are not enough to cover basic living expenses, including professors too. This phenomenon can seriously affect the quality of education. Therefore, I agree with the statement that universities should spend more money on salaries for professors, for the following reasons.
To begin with, increasing salaries for university professors can allow professors to put more efforts on educating students. Since they have enough income, they do not need to do additional jobs, such as endorsing commercial teaching materials or being teachers in cram schools, to increase their income. For example, in Taiwan, there are a lot of professors complaining that they do not receive salaries that they supposed to earn, which make them have to do many works, like proposing projects to earn government's subsidies or becoming experts in advertisements etc., to make sure that they have reasonable incomes. Though they do not do anything wrong, it actually lower the teaching quality in universities.
Moreover, raising salaries for professors can attract more talented and ingenious elites to work in educational industry. Since the average salary for professors increase, it makes teaching positions more competitive when elites are choosing their careers. For instance, I remember when I used to work as a research assistant in National Taiwan Normal University, I often heard my boss, who is the leader of the computer science department, said that it was really hard to recruit new professors today. Because most people who have computer science background prefer to work in the private firms than work as a professor. Thus, increasing salary for professors can make the position seem more attractive.
Although some people may say that it is better to increase research budget than increase the salaries for professors, since more professors are complaining about their budgets for conducting researches. However, if there is no compelling salary, how can we expect that there will be more potential people willing to become scholars, right?
To conclude, I firmly believe that professors deserve better salaries, since they are playing an important role in developing young generations. If nobody want to do that, then a country will for sure start decaying.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 669, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lowers', 'lows'?
Suggestion: lowers; lows
...y do not do anything wrong, it actually lower the teaching quality in universities. ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 55, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... firmly believe that professors deserve better salaries, since they are playing an imp...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 156, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'nobody' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wants'.
Suggestion: wants
...developing young generations. If nobody want to do that, then a country will for sur...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, however, if, may, moreover, really, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2047.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 379.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40105540897 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82991832079 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564643799472 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.51792114695 284% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.8598113593 48.9658058833 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.9375 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6875 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303398327373 0.236089414692 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111449363703 0.076458572812 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107461562176 0.0737576698707 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163566716576 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0979629038854 0.0645574589148 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 11.7677419355 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.