Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.
In academic society having different subject of courses to achieve a degree has been questioned by lots of students. The argument is whether having broad knowledge of many academic subjects is appropriate or having specialize in one specific subject. I am of the conviction that to be successful you must have broad knowledge of many academic subjects because you can work interaction in a group and set cohesion in separately subjects.
For beginning, I believe that having broad knowledge is going to increase your abilities at working in a team. For instance, last year I worked in a web design team, in last part of our website we must choose a suitable song regarding to purpose of the project and my friend who had been playing a piano came up with a suggestion that set very well. I think for learning on different subjects we just should fallow our curiosity and find our answers by surfing webs and we do not have to learn them academically.
Furthermore, in my opinion a person with broad knowledge could achieve relation in different subjects appropriately. In my university one of my professor came up with an idea that every two group with different major should interact with each other and she paired our teams. After a while those students obtain higher score that had aboard knowledge and we were of the conviction that those higher score students can related two major perfectly. My professor said and I cote "higher score goes to those groups that maintain cohesion through their work and no cohesion remains if team workers use their abroad knowledge" end cote.
To sum up, I claim that having broad knowledge of many academic subject can guide you through success road because you can work interaction in a group and set cohesion in separately subjects. In general, all successful celebrities had different academic knowledge.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
in separately subjects.
in separate subjects.
Sentence: After a while those students obtain higher score that had aboard knowledge and we were of the conviction that those higher score students can related two major perfectly.
Description: A modal auxillary is not usually followed by a verb, past participle
Suggestion: Refer to can and related
flaws:
1. No. of Different Words: 159 200
2. better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1
para 3: reason 2
para 4: reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
-------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 21 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 12 15
No. of Words: 312 350
No. of Characters: 1513 1500
No. of Different Words: 159 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.203 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.849 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.67 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 112 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 90 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 64 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 37 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 26 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.557 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.583 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.406 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.616 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.235 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...road knowledge could achieve relation in different subjects appropriately. In my ...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['furthermore', 'if', 'regarding', 'so', 'well', 'while', 'for instance', 'i think', 'in general', 'of course', 'in my opinion', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.223214285714 0.229887763892 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.181547619048 0.158761421928 114% => OK
Adjectives: 0.107142857143 0.0866891130778 124% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0238095238095 0.046263068375 51% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0803571428571 0.0685040099705 117% => OK
Prepositions: 0.139880952381 0.118717715034 118% => OK
Participles: 0.0535714285714 0.0351676179071 152% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.81027973215 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0208333333333 0.0309702414327 67% => OK
Particles: 0.00892857142857 0.00188951952338 473% => OK
Determiners: 0.0654761904762 0.0887237588012 74% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0267857142857 0.0209618222197 128% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.014880952381 0.0139019557991 107% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1869.0 2387.08602151 78% => OK
No of words: 312.0 408.028673835 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.99038461538 5.86048508987 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.48200974243 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.362179487179 0.338922669872 107% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.291666666667 0.251872472559 116% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.214743589744 0.174417080927 123% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.134615384615 0.112833075102 119% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81027973215 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525641025641 0.524397521467 100% => OK
Word variations: 54.1038709578 59.2087087015 91% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6684587814 58% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5533526081 127% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4722133475 48.84282405 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.75 120.699889404 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.5533526081 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.644075263715 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 55.1666666667 45.7405998639 121% => OK
Elegance: 1.45833333333 1.45489161554 100% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373334559299 0.300154397459 124% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.14113921623 0.103427244359 136% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0554583220534 0.0752933317313 74% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.578870358092 0.497263757937 116% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.133334482267 0.151897553556 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168029624641 0.114077575197 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107600331457 0.0781384742642 138% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.260895641544 0.336927656856 77% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0114644327418 0.067059652881 17% => Paragraphs are so close to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267835829153 0.210909579961 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126504281729 0.0618886996521 204% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8870967742 50% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.86379928315 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.91756272401 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 8.42114695341 59% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.75985663082 109% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 13.6433691756 81% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.