Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to read or watch the news presented by people whose views are similar to your own than by people whose views are different from yours.
Throughout history, news has played a prominent role in all societies. Because it is of paramount importance, people have always searched for ways to enhance the influence of news. Whether or not people prefer to listen or read news with people who have the same idea, is controversial. I content that humans who opt watch news with opposite idea benefit from an array of positive aspects. So, I disagree with this proposal. In the following paragraph, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons.
The first important factor to be mentioned is that the opposite idea helps each other to better analysis news. To elaborate on my point, when people try to see news with another person with a negative idea, they would better analysis news from a different perspective. In this situation, they can better understand the news and have opportunities to think about news from different aspects. Besides, people learn how to tolerate the opposite idea and how to defend their perspective. I think that it is an ability each a person must have.
Another reason which deserves some word here is that human can change the dangerous thinking of other people. To shed more light, when people try to watch the news with different ideas, they may show to other people their think is wrong. In this situation, an individual would able to change a dangerous and wrong idea of other people. Consider a person who advocates of Daesh for instance. Since he with other people who have different idea see news, his friend may better analysis Daesh acting. So, he may try to show her friend this ideology is wrong. And it causes several wars. Also, it causes kill many children and women that live in Iraq and Soria. It the sign of terrorism. If you want to join this group, you must live in your country and also kill children and woman. In this situation, people can show that other people think wrong and prevent a dangerous event. Or Take one recent event in my city, for instance, a wife killed her husband last month. Moreover, every media claimed that the woman was so evil and brutal. Nevertheless, some reporters found out that the woman was a victim of domestic violence and hurt by her husband almost every night. Fortunately, due to some fair reports, our society understood the true story and showed our pity. Hence, to understand the real version, people should fetch different news materials.
All in all, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that people better see news with people who have a different idea. I believe that a person not only can better analysis news but also can prevent spread a dangerous or wrong idea.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'Whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: Whether
... ways to enhance the influence of news. Whether or not people prefer to listen or read news wi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 878, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... wrong and prevent a dangerous event. Or Take one recent event in my city, for in...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, for instance, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2206.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 457.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82713347921 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48182684599 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483588621444 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 677.7 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.7983764047 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.0689655172 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7586206897 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1724137931 5.45110844103 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 3.85842293907 389% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217613889295 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590798381974 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064683466456 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152050160071 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349638349984 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.