Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to read or watch the news presented by people whose views are similar to your own than by people whose views are different from yours

There are various sources of getting the latest news in the world such as internet, newspaper and television. The reporters, complainers, interpreters and lots of other people are working on the news daily to present them. Some of the channels and sources have the same point of view with us and some others don't. As a matter of fact, some people prefer to read or watch the news from the sources which have the same idea as them and some other prefer to be informed the news through the people who have different prospective. Personally speaking, I agree with the second group because of the following reasons I will mention in the next paragraphs.
First, the point is not just getting the news, it is significance to find the true aspect of occurrences. If we always watch and listen the people with the same way of thinking as ourselves, we can never distinguish the biased news from the real ones. For instance, when an environment problem such as water shortage is appeared in a country, national TV programs will show it as a natural happening which happens because of the low rate of precipitation. The channels which are against the government will illustrate it as the fault of political decisions on building the dams and lots of industries around the water supplies. To have a clear view of the problem causes we need to listen to the group that have the discriminate interpretations from us.
Second, when the news presenters want to convey the information, they use their own reasons to explain the news. By listening to our opponent's views, we can expand our knowledge because maybe our knowledge in a field is not adequate enough and that's why we are opposed with some people's thinking and beliefs. Let's take a look at the water shortage problem again, if we are on the side of government and we don't watch the channels which are against the government we cannot learn something about the destructive effects of dams and manufacturing on the nature because the national channels won't bring them out.
In conclusion, people can choose their sources to get informed from the news which can be opposed their thoughts or in line with their perspectives. I think if we are listening to our opponents we can have a clear perception of the news and our knowledge will be grows.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...king on the news daily to present them. Some of the channels and sources have the same poin...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 309, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e point of view with us and some others dont. As a matter of fact, some people prefe...
^^^^
Line 2, column 713, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...e need to listen to the group that have the discriminate interpretations from us. Second, when...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...e in a field is not adequate enough and thats why we are opposed with some peoples th...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
... and thats why we are opposed with some peoples thinking and beliefs. Lets take a look ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 310, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...with some peoples thinking and beliefs. Lets take a look at the water shortage probl...
^^^^
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...we are on the side of government and we dont watch the channels which are against th...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, may, second, so, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1893.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 399.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74436090226 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70786202668 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46365914787 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 571.5 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.2383218357 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.2 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6 20.6045352989 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171364727849 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640646412687 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486451926541 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110753515194 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520407608934 0.0645574589148 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 58.1214874552 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.