Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, technology has invaded our daily routines with or without our consciousness. On the other hand, we are using more and more different means of transport to commute back and forth from a certain area to another destination. To my point of view, government should support financially more public transport rather that consider more important the advancement of Internet access. From my experience, spending money on the first issue would reduce the level of smog, would save worthless time and undoubtedly would reduce health issues related to Internet. First of all, spending money on public transportation would reduce the level of substances spread in atmosphere, especially in huge cities. By way of example, since in my birthplace, are new buses, as recent studies support, there is a decline in the amount of lethal gases in the air. As a result, the longevity is going to be increased in the next decade. Secondly, due to the fact that the most of buses, airplanes, trains as well would be replaced to new and more interactive means of transport, might save time. For instance, as transportation will require less time than before , the time saved could be helpful. Take for example a job interview. By investing on public transportation, the applicant will arrive earlier or on time and make a good firs impression. As a consequence her professional life will initiate. Finally, not developing Internet access, will provide a better health, in terms of eyesight and vertebral column. For example, not spending money on this aspect, might perhaps decrease the populations' attention toward technology and Internet precisely. By happening this, they will not have need of glasses to observe the real world and their posture will be right. In conclusion, based on the arguments explored above, I am of the opinion that It is more salient for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Not only will this improve our health, but also it might save time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: COMMUTE_BACK_AND_FORTH[1]
Message: Use simply 'commute'.
Suggestion: commute
...nd more different means of transport to commute back and forth from a certain area to another destinat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 955, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the buses') or simply say ''most buses''.
Suggestion: most of the buses; most buses
...ade. Secondly, due to the fact that the most of buses, airplanes, trains as well would be rep...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1145, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ation will require less time than before , the time saved could be helpful. Take f...
^^
Line 1, column 1315, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'firs'' or 'fir's'?
Suggestion: firs'; fir's
...rive earlier or on time and make a good firs impression. As a consequence her profes...
^^^^
Line 1, column 1332, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n time and make a good firs impression. As a consequence her professional life wil...
^^
Line 1, column 1548, Rule ID: MIGHT_PERHAPS[1]
Message: Use simply 'might', 'perhaps'.
Suggestion: might; perhaps
...ple, not spending money on this aspect, might perhaps decrease the populations attention towa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1575, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'populations'' or 'population's'?
Suggestion: populations'; population's
...this aspect, might perhaps decrease the populations attention toward technology and Interne...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 330.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89056775277 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575757575758 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1551478043 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4117647059 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.52941176471 5.45110844103 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.53405017921 22% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256205599866 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770477170398 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0923986994506 0.0737576698707 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256205599866 0.150856017488 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.