Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to read or watch the news presented by people whose views are similar to your own than by people whose views are different from yours
Today, getting information from others has top value in modern society. Being familiar with people opinions has numerous significant opportunities in resolve to do something by erratic notices. Although there are persons whose prefer to watch or read news that are similar to their own, in my opinion, it is brilliant to being familiar with people whose views are irrelevant from ours.
First and foremost, increasing the knowledge is the first reason why I believe that people need to be aware of different thinks. Actually, having a lot of ideas, either relevant or irrelevant, is a spectacular chance to being informed about others thinking and knowledge. As a matter of fact, living in this world is like fighting in the ring, and gathering all possible data from the people is the most important key for achieving in this war. Because, people can open their minds, improve their abilities and being aware of their weaknesses when they being informed by information. For instance, I never forget when I was in a competition with my university students for mechanical institute, there were students whose had some opposite ideas in compare mine, but I could use those to increase my abilities and covering my weaknesses to being achieve in speaking for university, and eventually I was selected by university students for university mechanical institute. That is why having all kind of views is dramatically important for prosperity.
Secondly, finding reliable individuals is another reason that I think should people get different views from other ones. It is necessary to have communication with human beings to being successful in this modern world, because information is the success key. Moreover, when people listen to other's opinions, they can be able to know them much better. Anybody has some exclusive thinking that listening to him is the only way to know his real instinct. For example, my friend and I used to have conversation about political issues. In those conversations sometimes, i figured out that some of my friends were really fanatic that it makes them unreliable for me. Hence, being patient and listening to opposite views help people to know each other better and give them a chance to identify each other.
In conclusion, however some persons prefer to listen or watch news that are analogous to their opinions, I believe that we should pay attention both sides of views. Because, people can be able to know each other better, they can increase their knowledge, improve their abilities and cover their weaknesses.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 322, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'be'?
Suggestion: be
... own, in my opinion, it is brilliant to being familiar with people whose views are ir...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 566, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...sues. In those conversations sometimes, i figured out that some of my friends wer...
^
Line 7, column 308, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r abilities and cover their weaknesses.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, as to, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, kind of, as a matter of fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 15.1003584229 199% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2139.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 417.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12949640288 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75287644182 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508393285372 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 676.8 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.5849716658 48.9658058833 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.833333333 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 5.45110844103 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185120221887 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662567874737 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0834712864992 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137006636009 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0970896597902 0.0645574589148 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.