Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is said that one of the most implying factor of whether a city is modernized is the soundness of public transportation. By having complete public transportation, numbers of modern tasks such as traffic jams, pollutions, and fluidity between different areas can be dealt with easily. Therefore, I cannot agree with the statement that government should spend more money on refining Internet access.
As mentioned above, a sound public transportation can fix the most common faced problem in cities: traffic jam. By transporting through buses, trains, and subway, which contains higher capacity rather than cars, traffic can become smoother and further improve the efficiency by creating a benign cycle that less private vehicles appeared on streets and public vehicles can operate well. For me, when I first visited the capital of Taiwan, where public transportation is much more advanced than where I used to leave, I was shocked that nowhere was unreachable by buses or MRT. During those years, I had used public transportation to itinerate the whole Taipei and experience the convenience of this city, which definitely does not exist in where I originally lived.
In addition, public transportation can also reduce the pollutions brought by inner combustion vehicles. A single bus contains much more passengers than private vehicles especially when each private vehicle contains only one passenger. By maximizing the capacity of public transportation, the pollution from vehicles can be reduced easily, and the air that breathed by citizens can also be removed of harmful particles. What's more, in Taipei, most buses are electric vehicles, which produce less pollutions, instead of traditional inner combustion vehicles.
Last but not least, the fluidity between different areas can also be improved by the development of public transportation. In the past, people who did not have private vehicles could only live in their village and the chances to reach out to newer things were extremely rare. By the advent of public transportations, reaching comprehensive things will become a common routine and the prospect of citizens can be broaden easily.
However, some may argue that Internet is the main source for modern people to get in touch in outer world. While it may be true to a certain extent, it is always better for people to look into things through themselves instead of through the Internet. Plus, the improvement of public transportation can also deal with traffic jam and pollutions mentioned above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 420, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...n also be removed of harmful particles. Whats more, in Taipei, most buses are electri...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 491, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun pollutions is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...es are electric vehicles, which produce less pollutions, instead of traditional inne...
^^^^
Line 4, column 317, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...By the advent of public transportations, reaching comprehensive things will becom...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, well, while, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2124.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 399.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32330827068 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92834594178 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548872180451 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2219379177 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.941176471 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4705882353 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.29411764706 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202649870129 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711929241099 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709165935912 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116237101955 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525665130502 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.