Throughout history, the advent of space travel and its exploration has played a prominent role in improving human's knowledge about its surrounding space. Some people may hold the view that it is an extra expense for the government to fund this field of study due to its high cost. However, some others may take the opposite viewpoint and believe that increasing the information about out of our planet is one of the essential parts of scientific investigations. From my perspective, the latter belief is true. In the subsequent paragraphs, I will delve into the two outstanding reasons which aptly elucidate this idea.
The first reason coming to mind to substantiate my standpoint is concerned with this issue that achieving knowledge about the circumstance of outer of our terrestrial planet will be useful for us. In fact, we live in such a world that every single factor will be connected somehow finally. Therefore, even the real truths and the happens that takes place in space could be impressive on our planet. By considering this fact, it is vital that the government ought to allocate a determined budget for space exploration and its related investigations.
Another equally significant point is a huge number of the scientist and space travelers are deeply investigating in the different aspect and features of the universe and its details for long years. Through these explorations, they have discovered valuable and important consequences. Moreover, increasing the knowledge of space would provide a remarkable infrastructure for developing distinctive concepts that are related to our life. For instance, traveling to the moon is one of the most crucial milestones of human's history in the recent century. Thus, the government must pay attention to the issues regarding astronomical stuff because of its particular importance.
To put it briefly, by taking to account all the reasons mentioned above, the space exploration in one of the considerable fields of study that is must be considered as a useful issue. Consequently, it is highly recommended that governments are obliged to fund for astronomy and space journeys.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 28, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'mind substantiating'.
Suggestion: mind substantiating
... this idea. The first reason coming to mind to substantiate my standpoint is concerned with this is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, consequently, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1798.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 342.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25730994152 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08094463247 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581871345029 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4832420985 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.375 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181518881662 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591750232853 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546174058279 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117798055771 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233936150741 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.