The reading passage and the lecture are both about a fossil of Tyrannosaurus rex. More specifically, the writer discusses some observations illustrate there are actual tissues which have remained from these kinds of dinosaurs. The lecturer in the listening passage disagrees and provides some evidence to refute all the mentioned conclusions in the article.
First of all, the author begins by stating that this fossil shows that leg bone includes many tiny branched channels which could be attributed to the blood vessels. The lecturer, however, disagrees. He declares that these soft, flexible parts are not essentially the blood vessels. He goes on to say that the bacteria might engender some hollow areas in the dead tissues. Therefore, they can be the bacteria colonization, not the blood vessels.
Furthermore, the author claims that the investigations revealed that there are diverse red paths inside the bone, which have a spherical shape. They probably indicate the existence of the red blood cells there. Again, the lecturer believes there are flaws in the writer's argument. The speaker holds that these reddish areas are not merely red blood cells. In fact, they could assess the presence of some reddish minerals.
Lastly, the article mentioned that the researchers found a fibrous protein in the dinosaur leg bone called Collagen which they exist in living bone tissue. In turn, the professor in the listening passage is doubtful that this is accurate. He states that it is too improbable about the existence of Collagen. He believes that they might have another reason than the T. rex bone collagen matrix, such as the researcher's skin which it contains Collagen too.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...ecturer believes there are flaws in the writers argument. The speaker holds that these ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, so, therefore, in fact, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 271.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22140221402 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6263213876 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553505535055 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.568049199 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.6111111111 110.228320801 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0555555556 21.698381199 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05555555556 7.06452816374 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.27373068433 281% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353133945826 0.272083759551 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0947916710992 0.0996497079465 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0803240798866 0.0662205650399 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19063634202 0.162205337803 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557999757619 0.0443174109184 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.4 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.