It goes without saying that in this sophisticated and progressive era in which we live in, all governments are always striving to bring prosperity, success and happiness to their country by investment in different fields. Whereas some individuals debate that allocation of a budget to space studies is really constructive, on the other side of the continuum, stand others, believing that it is actually a waste of money. As far as I am concerned, I categorically concur with the second mental attitude. In the ensuing essay, my perspective will be substantiated by underlying and conspicuous reasons.
To begin with, regarding this fact that the rate of financial problems has increased over the past few years in the most of the countries, it is not very reasonable for governments to spend much money on space exploration instead of people’s difficulties. Under such a circumstance, if any government dedicates a large amount of money to this field of study without paying attention to people’s economic problems, the people of that country will be disappointed and depressed. An example can shed some light on the subject. Several years ago, our government decided to dedicate one million dollars to space investigations. However, due to the fact that I am living in a third world country, we had lots of economic problems in that period and the majority of people were not even able to provide their livelihood things. Under such a circumstance, the people of my country get angry and depressed and started to complain about that decision. In a public gathering, one of the well-known individuals in my country spoke in front of the persons and mentioned that this is actually a waste of money.
Moreover, as a matter of fact, higher education plays a pivotal and indispensable role in the success of individuals in the near future, therefore, it is dramatically important for any government to pay attention to this subject rather than allocating of money to space studies. This is because the majority of investigations on this field of study leads to failure. However, if a country or government financially supports its juveniles and youngsters in higher education, they can bring lots of money for that country. An example can drive this notion home obviously. Several years ago, China allocated ten million dollars to higher education and sent one thousand juveniles abroad to continue their education. After four years, all students came back to their country and developed their automobile industry. In such a situation, nowadays, they import their cars to third world countries and have brought money, proud, happiness, success, satisfaction to their country. If they invested in space investigations and did not pay attention to their students’ education, they would not have been a prosperous country in the automobile industry.
To wrap it up, taking into account the aforementioned reasons and examples, I am of opinion that funding space travel instead of investing in other fields is completely a waste of money and it is not reasonable. This is because, these days, people have some other important difficulties in their life and also, most of the space explorations have led to failure, as a result, it is better for governments to pay attention to the most important fields which people’s life is dependent on.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, however, if, moreover, really, regarding, second, so, therefore, third, well, whereas, as a matter of fact, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 90.0 52.1666666667 173% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2819.0 1977.66487455 143% => OK
No of words: 545.0 407.700716846 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17247706422 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83169070408 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09194184427 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48623853211 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 878.4 618.680645161 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.9112492124 48.9658058833 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.238095238 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9523809524 20.6045352989 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177317216064 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053587016139 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485700526868 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117428735111 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268334321732 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 11.7677419355 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 86.8835125448 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.