Do You Agree Or Disagree With The Following Statement? Large cities should ban cars from the city center. Use Specific Reasons And Examples To Support Your Answer
There might be some people who think that banning cars from the city center is beneficial because it can help them to release traffic jam in large cities and make penetrators more convenient. However, in my opinion, it is not a good idea for the two subsequent reasons. First, it would cause inconvenience to the people who should use cars to access to the center of a city. Second, it can make another traffic jam in other places.
To begin with, if a large city ban cars from the city center, it would make people have much inconvenience. This is because many facilities and services are usually located in the center of a city, so people should visit there frequently. Moreover, there are cases that they should use their cars, such as someone who carry big cargo or have disability for walking or some places where is difficult to access by public transportation. For example, in Seoul, my country, almost all public services are located in Gwanghwamoon and it is the very center of Seoul. Few years ago, I should have visited there many times to get visa to access United States and I had trouble on my ankle, so I went there by my car. If I could not have used my car, it took much more time and make more inconvenience to me.
In addition, restricting cars from the city center cannot be a root-cause solution to ease the traffic jam. This is because people would use another way if they cannot penetrate the city center and this can make the traffic jam heavier because all the cars in the city would be concentrated on the other roads. I actually had experienced this. For example, I visited Paris in France there was a marathon event, so the cars were limited to penetrate the center of the city. Accordingly, I was forced to go to a detour and I experienced heaviest traffic jam in my life there. It took more than three times long than before.
To sum up, if cars are restricted to pass through the center of large city, it would bring many inconveniences to the citizen, and also it would make the traffic jam worse in the rest of the city. In this regard, I can assuredly say that a large city should not ban the cars from the city center.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 432, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ake another traffic jam in other places. To begin with, if a large city ban cars ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 793, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch more time and make more inconvenience to me. In addition, restricting cars...
^^
Line 3, column 801, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...time and make more inconvenience to me. In addition, restricting cars from the c...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 622, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... more than three times long than before. To sum up, if cars are restricted to pas...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, also, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, as for, for example, in addition, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1778.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50126582278 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5230156709 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.443037974684 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 576.0 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.013887167 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.533333333 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2 5.45110844103 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253794312211 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102788780597 0.076458572812 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102781878592 0.0737576698707 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191113572138 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035800033193 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.