Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Many people would say that leaders are born a leader. In fact they are not aware of but happened in their past. As far as I'm concerned, the ability of leading a nation needs education and learning. One does not necessarily become a leader by just growing up. There are two reason to illustrate this idea.
First of all, none of the leaders we know, became a leader out of nowhere. The fact is that they have studied for years in universities. Becoming a leader needs a lot of effort and endeavor. There are important rules that they should learn. Leaders should know how to control their community during the chaos or how to lead their people to the right road. They are responsible for threats and probable enemies. It is important that they act correctly in critical situations. These kinds of abilities need years of education and training. For instance, all of the presidents that lead countries have studied different aspects of law, politics and leadership for years. Besides most of them get to this place in their middle ages, which means they have passed a long and challenging path to reach this level. Thus, nobody is born with these skills, they need to lean them somewhere. That's why leadership does not come naturally.
Moreover, the environment can effect on somebody becoming a leader. To illustrate these, I can mention political families. Children that born in a family with a leader member, like a president, are more likely to become a leader too. This is due to the fact that, environment effects their interests as well as their abilities. They are eventually raised to be a leader. In other words, it is true that they are raised as a leader nevertheless, there is nothing to do with natural ability. The fact is that they gain skills as they grow up. It does not mean that they become a leader naturally.
As a conclusion, it is obvious, that leadership is not a natural ability. Similar to any other skills, it needs education and training. Although some environmental factors like family may effect on people who will become a leader, it is not something to come naturally.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...f but happened in their past. As far as Im concerned, the ability of leading a nat...
^^
Line 5, column 553, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...f education and training. For instance, all of the presidents that lead countries have stu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 882, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...ills, they need to lean them somewhere. Thats why leadership does not come naturally....
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y leadership does not come naturally. Moreover, the environment can effect on ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 189, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...e environmental factors like family may effect on people who will become a leader, it ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, well, for instance, in fact, as well as, first of all, in other words, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1752.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 366.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7868852459 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62200717315 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497267759563 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 544.5 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7132862299 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 62.5714285714 100.406767564 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.0714285714 20.6045352989 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17857142857 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.88709677419 286% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140845832489 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431850825487 0.076458572812 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436953869172 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0952337227471 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0126978356882 0.0645574589148 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.7 11.7677419355 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.61 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.002688172 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.