Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the modern world, we should never be impolite to another person.
By and large, it is established beyond doubt that politeness plays a consequential role in people's lives owing to the fact that it represents people's characteristics and hallmarks. Various points of view which are germane to the matter being discussed brings us to the moot question as to whether we should never take politeness into consideration when communicating with other humans. However, the popular sentiment to which I vehemently cling is that being impolite might have pernicious effects on our future lives due to the fact that a plethora of people prefer to spend their time with polite people. The underlying aim of this essay is to put forward some cogent reasons to shed light on a number of issues in this framework.
To commence with, there is a correlation between politeness and personality because being polite is the sign of a positive personality. Generally phrased, people's personalities depend on their politeness because not only can it helps people socialize and improve their social activities but also it can help human beings develop their confidence and esteem. As a palpable example, vast majorities of people are inclined toward the opinion that they should spend their precious time with polite people because it allows them to learn many things and learn how to behave and interact with others. If people be impolite to others, they will be no longer able to strengthen their circle of friendships. To elucidate more on this issue, hardly can impolite people make a progress day in-day out in their personal lives because it is the most significant quality of all human beings.
Another equally salient point in corroborating my stance is that be impolite to other people will provide an opportunity for children to mimic such a rude behavior. If we take a minute to ponder over it, children's minds are like a blank slate, everything can be written on. So, not only can bad language influence children's future negatively but also can encourage them to imitate immoral behaviors. It can be deduced from a combination of breadth of coverage and depth of detail that not only children but whole mature people might be influenced negatively by impoliteness because it will have fatal consequences in people's lives. Therefore, people should bend over backward to be polite and pay tribute to other people as well. However, every coin has two sides. In today's hectic city of life, in which unscrupulous people try to abuse from each other, using harsh language will patronize and support us not to be gullible toward any fact. However, it was a story in a nutshell; actually, there are more reasonable grounds that can lend weight to my personal perspective.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 284, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...iscussed brings us to the moot question as to whether we should never take politeness into co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nificant quality of all human beings. Another equally salient point in corrobo...
^^^
Line 7, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, so, then, therefore, well, as to, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2293.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 455.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03956043956 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77586332879 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549450549451 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 739.8 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.6106635054 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.388888889 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2777777778 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158675430234 0.236089414692 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0540127129053 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430842045575 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0859744700282 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498543567061 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 10.002688172 195% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.