Nowadays, with rapid globalization ongoing, the masses are enabled to take advantage of manifold recreational products from different countries to rejuvenate themselves. Whenever people are choosing movies and the latest shows on demand to enjoy, a general controversy arises. Some people advocate that domestic entertainment is more intriguing to the masses than those produced in foreign countries. As far as I am concerned, I hardly concur with this assertion, and I believe that foreign recreational products are as entertaining as domestic ones.
On the one hand, it is a blessed opportunity for us to broaden our horizons and enjoy advanced recreations of higher quality by watching foreign movies and shows. We can not only further our understanding of exotic cultures but also have a more comprehensive apprehension of alien countries. In addition, we can even experience better recreations on the grounds that some countries possess cutting-edge technologies and mature movie production systems, adding tactfully-designed and true-to-life visual effects to movies. Since the cultural ambiance of Asian countries is more conventional than that of western countries, I am granted the chance to enjoy more exciting stories and plots when watching foreign movies and TV shows. Take me as a prime example of this point. When I was a juvenile, I indulged in the series movies of Harry Potter. I was totally obsessed with attractive plots and impressive characters. The three-dimension special effects, which the movie corporations in my country were not capable of making, also caught my eye. I really enjoyed watching these movies and immersing in the "culture shocks".
On the other hand, it is also enjoyable to watch domestic movies and TV shows owing to the same cultural background and social atmosphere. Needless to say, we are more familiar with our own culture than foreign ones, and it is enormously demanding for us to fully comprehend foreign slang and ancient legends rooted in their cultures. It is easier for us to emotionally resonate with the heroes when we are watching domestic movies or TV shows. Besides, it is also amusing to enjoy traditional entertainment that developed and flourished in our motherland. For example, Chinese people love watching Xiaopin, a kind of traditional verbal recreation, in the Spring Festival Gala TV shows. Almost all of the actors and actresses come from the Northeast Region of China. During the show, their behaviors and dialects are very funny and ridiculous, making the audience laugh for a long time. Since we share the same cultural background, we can grasp some laugh spots in their dialogues and actions with ease. The happiness that stems from domestic movies and shows cannot be readily replaced by recreation that originates in other countries.
In a nutshell, it is too rash to label either of the two kinds of entertainment as the superior option. Both foreign and domestic recreational products can draw audiences, bringing them happiness and releasing their stress. The merits and upsides of both entertainments ought to be put emphasis on.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 695, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...e Spring Festival Gala TV shows. Almost all of the actors and actresses come from the Nort...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, really, so, as to, for example, in addition, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 13.8261648746 181% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2638.0 1977.66487455 133% => OK
No of words: 495.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32929292929 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06697939609 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527272727273 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 810.9 618.680645161 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3739829852 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.52 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165079125184 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433387953324 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402414908925 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0924300668398 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571306209929 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 148.0 86.8835125448 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.