In my opinion, movies and TV programs produced in foreign countries are more interesting than those made in one’s own countries.
Firstly, technological advances, including special effects for video editing, are one important contributing factor in the movies’ popularity. The reason is simple: there are many advanced special effects companies abroad, offering a range of effects for film, TV, and commercial industries. In other words, creating the best visual effects has become an integral part of filmmaking; animation, stop-motion, miniatures, and other visual illusions are usually required in a Hollywood blockbuster, materializing what we thought impossible in reality. A good example is the movie Inception directed by Nolan, who beautifully built multiple-level dream worlds in which architects can bend the laws of physics. Specifically, words failed me at the sight of those upside-down buildings and folded pedestrian streets. All of these are the end-product of special effects companies that challenge people’s traditional perceptions, making movies more thought-provoking and mind-blowing.
Secondly, a culturally diverse and pro-creativity environment is another critical reason. By that, I mean that some Asian countries are still relatively conservative, instead of being very open-minded about some genres and plots. By contrast, in other regions, TV programs producers are given greater autonomy and creative freedom; scriptwriters are given free rein to their imagination, thereby breeding more interesting and inviting TV shows. A good example is Black Mirror, a very popular British TV show that unveils how modern technologies can backfire and be used against their makers. Specifically, some episodes even boldly explore the dilemma and philosophy of human minds versus artificial intelligence, and these topics may not be allowed in some Asian countries because of tightened media censorship and other reasons.
In conclusion, it is my firm conviction that movies and TV shows made in foreign countries are more engaging.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For the future career success, is relating well to other people more important than studying hard at school? 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to spend money on traveling and vacation than save money for the future 90
- Many people value long lasting friendships Which ONE of the following qualities do you think is most important for determining whether a friendship between two people will last a long time Why They always help each other in a crisis or when something goes 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In modern days parents can learn more from their children than children can learn from their parents 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Educating young people about healthy food is important and should not be the job of families alone it should also be the responsibility of schools to teach their students about healthy eating 82
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, i mean, in conclusion, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 52.1666666667 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1775.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 302.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.87748344371 4.8611393121 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21764527037 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.655629139073 0.524837075471 125% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7323325595 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.538461538 100.406767564 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2307692308 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 5.45110844103 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274318525412 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0953185608549 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132598598733 0.0737576698707 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239091169644 0.150856017488 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.16292858644 0.0645574589148 252% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 11.7677419355 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 58.1214874552 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.12 10.9000537634 157% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.01818996416 132% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, i mean, in conclusion, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 52.1666666667 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1775.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 302.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.87748344371 4.8611393121 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21764527037 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.655629139073 0.524837075471 125% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7323325595 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.538461538 100.406767564 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2307692308 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 5.45110844103 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274318525412 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0953185608549 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132598598733 0.0737576698707 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239091169644 0.150856017488 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.16292858644 0.0645574589148 252% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 11.7677419355 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 58.1214874552 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.12 10.9000537634 157% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.01818996416 132% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.