I think that having similar interests or views on important topics is the most important factor in maintaining a long-lasting friendship.
First of all, one important point is that shared interests are a stepping stone to a fun and exciting partnership between friends. The reason is that people can find an endless supply of common topics, and these common topics provide a foundation for regular communication. Regular interaction proves to be the key to enhancing mutual friendship, creating a virtuous circle in this regard. As a result, it is possible for acquaintances to cement and maintain a long-lasting friendship. For example, my friend Tom and I are both fascinated with role-playing video games, so we always meet and talk about how to accomplish challenging missions in games by searching for the official walkthrough and gaming strategies. Moreover, I often invite him to my house and we play GTA5 -- a popular game upgraded for PlayStation 5 with stunning visuals -- at weekends. Over time, the more we communicate and play together, the stronger the bond between us grows. Clearly, it is our common interest in computer games that helps us continue our friendship until now.
When it comes to other options, we have to admit that helping each other during a crisis can enhance mutual friendship, but there is a serious problem that goes unmentioned: continuity. By that I mean, as soon as the crisis is over, one’s life would get back to normal and it would not be absolutely necessary to lend a helping hand. As this necessity no longer arises, friends’ link can be gradually weakened, if not completely severed, meaning that the goal of long-term friendship is not achievable. As to friends’ complete trust, this seems a good idea to strengthen the bond because trust is usually the cornerstone of all relationships. However, if friends only have trust instead of common topics and interests, this means that two friends would still fight over hot-button topics like religion and politics, thereby ruining this friendship. In fact, the same commonality of interest, not trust, is the fuel for deeper relationships; without emotional fuel, relationships gradually lose their spark after a while, thus exposing more vulnerability.
In conclusion, if we want to keep a long-lasting friendship, the priority is to have similar interests or views.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 290, Rule ID: ABSOLUTELY_ESSENTIAL[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessary'.
Suggestion: necessary
... get back to normal and it would not be absolutely necessary to lend a helping hand. As this necessi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, thus, while, as to, for example, i mean, i think, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1992.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 383.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20104438642 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04730788455 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600522193211 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2433515472 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.5 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9375 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4375 5.45110844103 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246065983803 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819078017298 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714194388724 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170798288502 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456848040057 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.