Since human beings have extremely complicated behaviors, gaining deep knowledge about their attitudes is really intricate and nearly impossible. A controversial question here is whether movies, books, and other materials people follow can help us know them. Personally, I believe that humans are complex creatures, so the media are not effective in gaining enough information about them. To support my opinion, I will elaborately discuss the idea in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, the psychological behaviors and opinions of the human are unpredictable. This fantastic creature is full of complexity. Now that numerous researches have been published, we know that humans have unbelievable features. As further as we realize the human characteristics, we amaze more. The diversity of human idiosyncracies is astonishing. If we suppose that we can know someone by just looking at his/her interests, it is hilarious. This complex creature is not as easy as a book or movie. Not only can we not know a person entirely by their favorite books, movies, music, and so on, but also we can not understand them after several years of communication.
Another worthwhile reason is that people usually are interested in movies and books that are not very similar to their reality. Since it is more exciting and helpful for people to follow something different. In other words, maybe the type of books that someone study is correlated with hidden preferences or failures. For example, my friend, Jina, really loves romance novels. During the day, she reads famous love-story books. Thus, it is anticipated that one may consider her as a romantic girl. Surprisingly, when she broke up with her boyfriend, I did not see any sorrow in her feeling. Leaving people for her is as easy as a cake. Unfortunately, she is very nasty in her relationships and prefers to remain in her shell without socializing. Before close communication with her, I was glad that I had found a romantic friend. As soon as I communicated more with her, I felt regretful because I understood that I was mistaken. Unless someone's favorite books and movies are related to his personality, one can not make a correct inference about him.
To sum up, someone's interests are substantial clues to predict his/her behaviors. However, I do not believe that it is a significant way to achieve information about people. The more a creature is sophisticated, the harder is to know it. Moreover, maybe people behave differently from their outer picture. So, I do not judge someone with the first glimpse. It may be disappointing that humans are not easy to be discovered soon. Actually, a long time is needed to know individuals' characteristics deeply.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 661, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hem after several years of communication Another worthwhile reason is that people...
^^^
Line 3, column 575, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... I did not see any sorrow in her feeling Leaving people for her is as easy as a c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, really, so, thus, while, for example, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 15.1003584229 192% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2207.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 444.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97072072072 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96913057046 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515765765766 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 738.0 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 20.6003584229 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 444.0 20.1344086022 2205% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 48.9658058833 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 2207.0 100.406767564 2198% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 444.0 20.6045352989 2155% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 125.0 5.45110844103 2293% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 11.8709677419 8% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212782024456 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.212782024456 0.076458572812 278% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120997935239 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370792849481 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 224.0 11.7677419355 1904% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -387.64 58.1214874552 -667% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.10430107527 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 177.6 10.1575268817 1748% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.03 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 29.22 8.01818996416 364% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 62.0 10.002688172 620% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 179.6 10.0537634409 1786% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 62.0 10.247311828 605% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.