Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
One can learn about another person from the books and movies that the person likes.
Human beings have extremely complicated behaviors; hence, gaining deep knowledge about the individual’s attitude is really difficult and nearly impossible. A controversial question here is that whether movies, books, and other materials which people follow can help us to know them or not. Personally, I believe that human is a complex creature; so, the media are not effective to gain enough information about them. To support my opinion, I will elaborately discuss about the idea in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, the psychological behaviors and opinions of the human, this amazing creature with full of complexity, are unpredictable. Every day numerous research papers are publishing that inform us about various unbelievable features in humans that amaze us extremely. Therefore, it is hilarious, if we suppose that we can know someone by just looking at his/her interests. This complex creature is not as easy as a book or movie; hence, not only can not we know a person completely by their favorite books, movies, music, and so on, but also we can not understand them after several years of communication.
Another worthwhile reason is that people usually are interested in movies and books that are not very similar to their reality because it is more exciting and helpful for them. In other words, maybe the type of books that someone study is correlated with his/her hidden preference or his/her failure. For example, my friend, Jina, really loves romance novels, and most of the time, she reads and reviews famous love-story books such as Remeo and Juliette. Nevertheless, she is really unfriendly in her relationships and prefers to remain in her shell without any socializing. Surprisingly, when she broke up with her boyfriend, I did not see any sorrow in her feeling because leaving people for her is completely easy. Although I supposed that she must be a really romantic girl before close communication with her, after more socializing and experience, I understood that she is not like her favorite books.
To sum up, although someone’s interests are considerable clues to predict his/her behaviors and preferences, I think it is not a significant way for achieving information about people due to the fact that they are more sophisticated than something we suppose. Moreover, maybe people behave differently from their outer picture; therefore, I do not judge someone with the first glimpse. Actually, a long time is needed to know individuals’ characteristics deeply.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
... hence gaining deep knowledge about the individuals attitude is really difficult and nearly...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 600, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hem after several years of communication Another worthwhile reason is that people...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, hence, if, look, may, moreover, nevertheless, really, so, therefore, while, for example, i suppose, i think, such as, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2049.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10972568579 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87713766741 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536159600998 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 672.3 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 20.6003584229 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 401.0 20.1344086022 1992% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 48.9658058833 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 2049.0 100.406767564 2041% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 401.0 20.6045352989 1946% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 171.0 5.45110844103 3137% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 11.8709677419 8% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196007183086 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.196007183086 0.076458572812 256% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114418005938 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405938274869 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 203.1 11.7677419355 1726% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -344.0 58.1214874552 -592% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.10430107527 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 160.9 10.1575268817 1584% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.84 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 27.23 8.01818996416 340% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 62.0 10.002688172 620% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 162.4 10.0537634409 1615% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 62.0 10.247311828 605% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.