Do you agree or disagree with the following statement One can learn about another person from the books and movies that the person likes

Human beings have extremely complicated behaviors; hence, gaining deep knowledge about the individual’s attitude is really difficult and nearly impossible. A controversial question here is that whether movies, books, and other materials which people follow can help us to know them or not. Personally, I believe that human is a complex creature; so, the media are not effective to gain enough information about them. To support my opinion, I will elaborately discuss the idea in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, the psychological behaviors and opinions of the human, this amazing creature full of complexity, are unpredictable. Every day numerous research papers are publishing that inform us about various unbelievable features in humans that amaze us extremely. So, humans are so complex and have various aspects of characteristics. If we suppose that we can know someone by just looking at his/her interests, it is meaningless. I believe that this complex creature is not as easy as a book or movie. A disadvantage of inferring people from his/her favorites is that it does not give us a comprehensive vision of all personality aspects. On the other hand, I agree that one should have a long communication with a person in order to realize his/her idiosyncrasies.
Another worthwhile reason is that people usually are interested in movies and books that are not very similar to their reality because it is more exciting and helpful for them. In other words, maybe the type of books that someone study is correlated with his/her hidden preference or his/her failure. I think the judgments about one's personality based on his/her favorite movies are not reliable. One drawback of such judging is that our judgments may be based on false evidence. Therefore, it is not trustworthy. For example, my friend, Jina, really loves romance novels, and most of the time, she reads and reviews famous love-story books such as Romeo and Juliette. Nevertheless, she is really unfriendly in her relationships and prefers to remain in her shell without any socializing. Surprisingly, when she broke up with her boyfriend, I did not see any sorrow in her feeling because leaving people for her is completely easy. Although I supposed that she must be a really romantic girl before close communication with her, after more socializing and experience, I understood that she is not like her favorite books. It is a fact that false evidence leads to false conclusions. So, favorite books and movies are not always reliable pieces of evidence for the conclusion. On the bright side, I am confident that there is no way to give valid information about people except socializing.
To sum up, although someone’s interests are considerable clues to predict his/her behaviors and preferences, I think it is not a significant way for achieving information about people due to the fact that they are more sophisticated than something we suppose. Moreover, maybe people behave differently from their outer picture; therefore, I do not judge someone with the first glimpse. The inferences about someone's traits based on favorite materials are not reliable enough. Actually, a long time is needed to know individuals’ characteristics deeply.

Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
... hence gaining deep knowledge about the individuals attitude is really difficult and nearly...
Line 2, column 759, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...n order to realize hisher idiosyncrasies Another worthwhile reason is that people...
Line 3, column 325, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...her failure I think the judgments about ones personality based on hisher favorite mo...
Line 3, column 1248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...le pieces of evidence for the conclusion On the bright side I am confident that t...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, hence, if, look, may, moreover, nevertheless, really, so, therefore, while, for example, i suppose, i think, such as, in other words, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 15.1003584229 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2643.0 1977.66487455 134% => OK
No of words: 519.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09248554913 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7730044521 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94038969748 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483622350674 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 875.7 618.680645161 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 20.6003584229 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 519.0 20.1344086022 2578% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 48.9658058833 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 2643.0 100.406767564 2632% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 519.0 20.6045352989 2519% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 179.0 5.45110844103 3284% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 11.8709677419 8% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221693971945 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.221693971945 0.076458572812 290% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128802965624 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325619545227 0.0645574589148 50% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 262.0 11.7677419355 2226% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -463.77 58.1214874552 -798% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.10430107527 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 206.9 10.1575268817 2037% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.72 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 32.94 8.01818996416 411% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 62.0 10.002688172 620% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 209.6 10.0537634409 2085% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 62.0 10.247311828 605% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.