Question :Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Providing Internet access is just as important as other services, such as building roads, so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There is no doubt that nowadays, Internet is one of the most vital parts of society. It is due to the fact that thanks to the technology, people around the world can communicate with each other efficiently. Moreover, Internet is a helpful platform for dispersing positive information and removing frontiers between various cities and countries. In this regard, a controversial question is that whether the government should offer free Internet access to all citizens or not. Personally, it is my firm conviction that today's, Internet access is as necessary as building roads or apartments for people; therefore, I think not only does offering free Internet is constructive, but also it is right of all citizens because of the following reasons.
First and foremost, having access to Internet helps to enhance general public's knowledge because Internet is a worthy database including valuable information. Various type of information such as online courses, scientific websites, informative pod-casts and so on are freely available for the public. Actually, all people who have access to the Internet can surf the fantastic websites and improve their knowledge. For example, I am such a person who positively addicted to Internet and investigate “Science.com” contents. This activity has changed my perspective and broaden my wisdom. I learned myriad concepts and facts about biology, geology, psychology and so on which are helping me in the numerous aspects of my life such as gaining top score in my academic tests. From another side, it is clear that the growth of individuals make a more prosperous society that benefits all members. So, providing a situation in which all members have Internet access not only is effective in increasing their insight, but also creates a better place for both people and government as a whole.
Another worthwhile factor is that nobody can reject the significant impact of Internet in providing welfare and facilitated life for human. Indeed, people can take online taxi, reserving doctor appointment, establish their business and so forth just by using the Internet and one smart-phone. For example, before having Internet access, taking a taxi was really difficult for me. However, after having access, I can take an online taxi by Uber application that utterly has improved my welfare and satisfaction. To make the story short, it is the duty of the government to suggest this service to citizens in order to decrease their difficulties.
To recapitulate, the government is responsible for suggesting services to boost both citizens' welfare and wisdom. Hence, Internet access as a vital requirement should be available for all equally. By this, the government can satisfy citizens' desires.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 711, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve, but also it is right of all citizens because of the following reasons. First...
^^
Line 2, column 72, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...ss to Internet helps to enhance general publics knowledge because Internet is a worthy ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 86, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
...e for suggesting services to boost both citizens welfare and wisdom. Hence, Internet acc...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, really, so, therefore, while, for example, i think, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2305.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 433.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3233256351 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96575184624 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54272517321 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 733.5 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7620987291 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.761904762 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.619047619 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.04761904762 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339716690926 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100859603218 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706754982691 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218152930859 0.150856017488 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512345273195 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 86.8835125448 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.