Schools should ask students to evaluate their teachers. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There is no doubt that education is a highly essential part of society. Students learn the knowledge about various aspects of life during their study. Therefore, the amount of students’ prosperity has correlation with the quality of teaching in the education system. In this regard, some people believe that schools should ask students to fill a questionnaire in order to evaluate their teachers’ performance. However, others think the approach is not a good idea. Personally, I agree with the first view because of the following considerable factors.
First and foremost, evaluating the teachers’ performance can help school managers in order to regulate their employees’ salary. Nowadays, novel schools use this approach for giving fair salary to their workers. The strategy not only does increase teachers’ motivation to show their best in teaching and behaving with students, but also it provides the feeling of working at a fair atmosphere. For example, my father, who is teacher of math, is working at Shahid Mahallati school where his boss ask the pupils to give feedback about their teachers in order to boost both students’ learning rate and teachers’ presentation skills. Also, the school determines my father’s salary based on his result; hence, he is always enthusiastic for improving his teaching and communication skills. As an example in this way, It was highly surprising for me when I saw that my father search on the Internet to find the best way for teaching complicated mathematical formula to students. After huge amount of effort, he found a teaching strategy that was based on story telling. The approach gave rise to not only an excellent learning in students, but also good feedback about my father that provided high income for him and me as his daughter. Briefly, asking pupils to give feedback about their teachers is beneficial for both teachers and students.
Another worthy factor is that evaluating is the best method for improving. Actually, some teachers do not aware of their negative points; so, evaluation is an excellent strategy to make them alert. In other words, no one is perfect and all teachers also are in the road of leaning, boosting their advantages and removing their faults. This improvement can provide a constructive environment in which teachers will be converted to nearly perfect lecturers who have fewer demerits in their teaching for future students. To make the story short, students also can be a teacher when they filling a form to evaluate their professors because they can learn many things from criticisms.
To recapitulate, education is this century is utterly essential, and we should pay more attention for creating the best possible form of learning. In my opinion, criticizing teachers by students is a good way to fulfill the desire. It is due to the fact that the way can keen to enhance their abilities plus to being aware about their weakness.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 345, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...us to being aware about their weakness.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, briefly, but, first, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, no doubt, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2458.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 477.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15303983229 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8208526814 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509433962264 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 738.9 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6323766598 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.869565217 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7391304348 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.65217391304 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238670140331 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741508400284 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063527383851 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153117555119 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335737317005 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.