Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Providing Internet access is just as important as other services, such as building roads, so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The era we are living in is the era of technology. It has now become a need of the day rather than a want. There is no shortage of opinions that internet access is not as important as other services. I have a different opinion. I strongly believe that having access to free of cost internet is as important as other services such as building roads. In the following essay, I intend to put forth my points and reasons in support of my belief.
To begin with, the first exquisite point to be mentioned is that the internet has now become a need rather than a want. From an education point of view, access to free of cost internet will enable citizens to have access to their remote educational programs irrespective of their location and social status. On the other hand, not having a free internet may create hurdles and problems for people in acquiring education. So, having access to the internet is as necessary as building roads and other basic necessities of life. To exemplify, one of my school friends had to relocate due to her father's job demand to a rural area just before our final examinations. Consequently, she has to appear in her examinations remotely. Thus, this example illustrates that if there was no internet access she would not have been able to appear in her finals.
Secondly, to explain broadly, from a social point of view, the internet plays an important role in connecting people on different forums such as facebook, twitter, instagram etc. It provides people with good mental health. They may also benefit themselves by doing digital marketing. However, no access to the internet will deprive them from some remarkable opportunities around the globe. Moreover, people may help each other internationally through various online platforms. This can be best explained by my own example, during covid when everyone was stuck in their homes and due to lack of interaction facing a lot of anxiety. To overcome this,I started my online webinars for people undergoing depression and anxiety about how to cope up with it and some remedies. Therefore, this explains that if there were no internet I would not be able to help so many people.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that having access to free internet is every citizen's basic right as it provides them a quality of education irrespective of their social status and location. Also, it helps them to connect themselves around the globe.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 25, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The era we are living in is the era of technology. It has now bec...
^^
Line 4, column 500, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...s necessary as building roads and other basic necessities of life. To exemplify, one of my school...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 648, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , I
...acing a lot of anxiety. To overcome this,I started my online webinars for people u...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, as to, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2013.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87409200969 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71521757412 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510895883777 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 643.5 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.9556807591 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5217391304 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9565217391 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.82608695652 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316829928373 0.236089414692 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087238867845 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907667486191 0.0737576698707 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19387250992 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593625789545 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.