Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? One can learn a lot about a person from the types of friends this person has.
By and large, it is established beyond doubt that people have different characteristics and hallmarks and they bend over backward so as to learn and gain enough information about each other by spending time, social media, friends and so forth. Various points of view which are germane to the matter being discussed brings us to the moot question as to whether people can know and learn a lot about each other through their different types of friends. However, the popular sentiment to which I vehemently cling is that although friends might help us get information about others, people have to spend some time with people to learn about them thoroughly and deeply. The underlying aim of this essay is to put forward some cogent reasons to shed light on a number of issues in this framework.
To commence with, friends play an important role in our lives and they are the inseparable part of our day to day life because we use to spend our precious time with our close friends. Generally phrased, if we want to learn about a person, it is better to spend some time with that person owing to the fact that human beings have various features and traits. As a palpable example, my brother is studying at a university abroad and he is a diligent and shrewd student with a hard-working attitude. But most of his friends are not knowledgeable and have less level of complication when it comes to education and career. So, with these features, hardly can we learn a lot about my brother because his character is totally different in spite of having different types of friends. To elucidate more on this issue, if we spend some time with people not only can we learn about them extensively but also we can strengthen our circle of friendships.
Another equally salient point in corroborating my stance is that learn about people by their friends might mislead people and get then wrong information about people's habits. If we take a minute to ponder over it, people always represent different traits and habits, so, hardly can individuals learn about a person by a perfunctory glance at his/her features. Indeed, it is necessarily needed to learn about people's true characters and analyze them meticulously. It can be deduced from a combination of breadth of coverage and depth of detail that people's friends might not provide an opportunity for us to learn about them truly and correctly. So, we can rely on other means like social media owing to the fact that people introduce themselves completely.
However, every coin has two sides. In most cases, people spend most of their time with their friends, so, it provides fertile ground for us to learn about a person by his/her friends. For example, when a person spends his total time with unscrupulous people, we can reach the conclusion that the person could not be a reliable human to spend time with and count on him. However, it was a story in a nutshell; actually, there are more reasonable grounds that can lend weight to my personal perspective.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...d hallmarks and they bend over backward so as to learn and gain enough information about...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 347, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...iscussed brings us to the moot question as to whether people can know and learn a lot about e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
... part of our day to day life because we use to spend our precious time with our clo...
^^^
Line 9, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, so, then, as to, for example, by and large, in most cases, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 66.0 43.0788530466 153% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 85.0 52.1666666667 163% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2534.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 526.0 407.700716846 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8174904943 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78901763229 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63685951287 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471482889734 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 773.1 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.6585629484 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.7 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265643447743 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0884736477877 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531759126841 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144587454764 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743429053173 0.0645574589148 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.002688172 185% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.